Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 08:30:24 05/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 03, 2004 at 11:04:30, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On May 02, 2004 at 22:46:32, Mike Byrne wrote: > >>On May 02, 2004 at 17:39:14, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On May 02, 2004 at 14:52:09, John Merlino wrote: >>> >>>>This position is from CM9000 Judge v Shredder 8 in Round 35 of Graham Banks' >>>>"Super Tournament II". >>>> >>>>[D]1r5k/3qn1pp/3bNp2/1r1P4/1pN5/1Q5P/3R1PP1/3R2K1 w - - 0 39 >>>> >>>>Both sides have passed pawns that are well protected, but White has a strong >>>>Knight on e6 that cannot easily be dislodged. What does CMJudge play? >>>> >>>>Nd4!! giving up the outpost and the passed pawn with one move! CM_SKR needs 2:11 >>>>to find this move on an AMD 2500+. >>> >>> >>> >>>crafty finds this one almost instantly: >>> >>> >>> 9 5.31 0.22 1. Rd4 Be5 2. Nxe5 fxe5 3. R4d2 Qd6 >>> 4. Qg3 g6 5. Re2 Nxd5 6. Rxe5 >>> 9 5.50 0.27 1. Nd4 Rxd5 2. Nf3 Rbb5 3. Qa4 Bf4 >>> 4. Nb6 Qb7 5. Nxd5 Nxd5 >>> 9-> 5.50 0.27 1. Nd4 Rxd5 2. Nf3 Rbb5 3. Qa4 Bf4 >>> 4. Nb6 Qb7 5. Nxd5 Nxd5 (s=7) >>> 10 5.80 0.19 1. Nd4 Rxd5 2. Nf3 Rbb5 3. Qa4 Rb7 >>> 4. Qxd7 Rxd7 5. Rxd5 Nxd5 6. Rxd5 Bh2+ >>> 7. Kxh2 Rxd5 (s=6) >>> 10-> 7.24 0.19 1. Nd4 Rxd5 2. Nf3 Rbb5 3. Qa4 Rb7 >>> 4. Qxd7 Rxd7 5. Rxd5 Nxd5 6. Rxd5 Bh2+ >>> 7. Kxh2 Rxd5 (s=2) >>> 11 9.69 0.46 1. Nd4 Bf4 2. Nxb5 Bxd2 3. Nbd6 Bf4 >>> 4. Nf7+ Kg8 5. d6 Nc6 6. Nce5 Bh2+ >>> 7. Kxh2 fxe5 >>> 11-> 10.24 0.46 1. Nd4 Bf4 2. Nxb5 Bxd2 3. Nbd6 Bf4 >>> 4. Nf7+ Kg8 5. d6 Nc6 6. Nce5 Bh2+ >>> 7. Kxh2 fxe5 >>> 12 12.26 0.65 1. Nd4 Bf4 2. Nxb5 Bxd2 3. Nbd6 Bf4 >>> 4. Nf7+ Kg8 5. d6 Nd5 6. Rxd5 Kxf7 >>> 7. Qf3 Bg5 >>> 12-> 13.58 0.65 1. Nd4 Bf4 2. Nxb5 Bxd2 3. Nbd6 Bf4 >>> 4. Nf7+ Kg8 5. d6 Nd5 6. Rxd5 Kxf7 >>> 7. Qf3 Bg5 >>> 13 25.69 0.58 1. Nd4 R5b7 2. Nc6 Rc8 3. Re2 Bc5 4. >>> Nxe7 Bxe7 5. d6 Bf8 6. Rd5 Rc6 7. Red2 >>> f5 >>> 13-> 28.58 0.58 1. Nd4 R5b7 2. Nc6 Rc8 3. Re2 Bc5 4. >>> Nxe7 Bxe7 5. d6 Bf8 6. Rd5 Rc6 7. Red2 >>> f5 >>> 14 45.39 0.61 1. Nd4 Bf4 2. d6 Bxd2 3. dxe7 Rc5 4. >>> Rxd2 Qxe7 5. Rd1 Rg5 6. Ne3 Rc8 7. >>> Ndc2 Rb5 8. Nd5 >>> 14-> 54.13 0.61 1. Nd4 Bf4 2. d6 Bxd2 3. dxe7 Rc5 4. >>> Rxd2 Qxe7 5. Rd1 Rg5 6. Ne3 Rc8 7. >>> Ndc2 Rb5 8. Nd5 (s=2) >>> 15 1:48 0.62 1. Nd4 R5b7 2. Nc6 Rc8 3. Rc2 Ra8 4. >>> Nxd6 Qxd6 5. Nxe7 Qxe7 6. d6 Qd7 7. >>> Rc4 Ra3 8. Qb2 Ra4 9. Qb3 >>> 15-> 2:05 0.62 1. Nd4 R5b7 2. Nc6 Rc8 3. Rc2 Ra8 4. >>> Nxd6 Qxd6 5. Nxe7 Qxe7 6. d6 Qd7 7. >>> Rc4 Ra3 8. Qb2 Ra4 9. Qb3 >>> >>> >>> >> >>Which machine is this Bob? - appears to be about 2x of my dual 1.7 P4's - which >>is now almost 3 years old.... > >It's my normal dual 2.8ghz xeon... > >That is currently the fastest thing I have. However, with the 32-node >dual-opteron on the way, "cluster-crafty" is going to happen. :) So that would be 64 opterons. That's interesting. Is the effort comparable to the SMP-to-NUMA conversion, or is it a bit more complicated? Since this machine will be somewhat readily available, will we see it on ICC very often? Perhaps only for big events? > >> >> >>Crafty v19.12 SE [Standard] (2 cpus) >>SE code disabled >> >>Black(1): 1r5k/3qn1pp/3bNp2/1r1P4/1pN5/1Q5P/3R1PP1/3R2K1 w - - 0 39 >>White(1): go >> clearing hash tables >> time surplus 29.91 time limit 1666:39 (1666:39) >> depth time score variation (1) >> 1-> 0.00 0.31 1. Nxd6 Qxd6 >> 2 0.00 0.34 1. Nxd6 Qxd6 2. Rd4 >> 2-> 0.01 0.34 1. Nxd6 Qxd6 2. Rd4 >> 3 0.01 -1 1. Nxd6 >> 3 0.01 -0.07 1. Nxd6 Qxd6 2. Qg3 Nf5 >> 3 0.01 0.23 1. Rd4 Nf5 2. Rg4 >> 3-> 0.03 0.23 1. Rd4 Nf5 2. Rg4 >> 4 0.03 0.19 1. Rd4 Nf5 2. Re4 Re8 3. Nxd6 Qxd6 >> 4 0.04 0.22 1. Rd3 Re8 2. Nxd6 Qxd6 3. Rd4 >> 4-> 0.04 0.22 1. Rd3 Re8 2. Nxd6 Qxd6 3. Rd4 (s=3) >> 5 0.06 0.01 1. Rd3 Re8 2. Qa4 Nf5 3. Qb3 (s=2) >> 5 0.06 0.24 1. Rd4 Nf5 2. Re4 Re8 3. Qf3 >> 5-> 0.09 0.24 1. Rd4 Nf5 2. Re4 Re8 3. Qf3 (s=2) >> 6 0.12 0.27 1. Rd4 Be5 2. Nxe5 fxe5 3. Rg4 Rxd5 >> 4. Rxd5 Nxd5 5. Nxg7 >> 6-> 0.18 0.27 1. Rd4 Be5 2. Nxe5 fxe5 3. Rg4 Rxd5 >> 4. Rxd5 Nxd5 5. Nxg7 (s=3) >> 7 0.23 0.08 1. Rd4 Be5 2. Nxe5 fxe5 3. Rg4 Nxd5 >> 4. Nxg7 Qf7 (s=2) >> 7 0.26 0.11 1. Nxd6 Qxd6 2. Qg3 Qxg3 3. fxg3 b3 >> 4. d6 Re5 5. Nc7 >> 7-> 0.59 0.11 1. Nxd6 Qxd6 2. Qg3 Qxg3 3. fxg3 b3 >> 4. d6 Re5 5. Nc7 (s=16) >> 8 0.64 0.04 1. Nxd6 Qxd6 2. Qg3 Qxg3 3. fxg3 b3 >> 4. d6 Re5 5. Nc7 Nf5 (s=15) >> 8 0.98 0.08 1. h4 Re8 2. Qf3 Bb8 3. h5 Rc8 4. Qe4 >> Bd6 5. Nxd6 Qxd6 (s=12) >> 8 1.12 0.11 1. g3 Re8 2. Nxd6 Qxd6 3. Rd4 f5 4. >> Qa4 Rbb8 5. Qb3 (s=11) >> 8-> 1.98 0.11 1. g3 Re8 2. Nxd6 Qxd6 3. Rd4 f5 4. >> Qa4 Rbb8 5. Qb3 (s=4) >> 9 3.95 0.01 1. g3 Rc8 2. Nxd6 Qxd6 3. Qf3 Ng6 4. >> Qd3 Rb7 5. Qb3 Re7 (s=3) >> 9 6.86 0.02 1. Kh1 Rc8 2. Rd4 Be5 3. Nxe5 fxe5 >> 4. Rxb4 Rxd5 5. Rxd5 Nxd5 6. Rb8 (s=2) >> 9 8.37 0.13 1. h4 Kg8 2. Nd4 R5b7 3. Re2 Re8 4. >> Nxd6 Qxd6 5. Re6 Qf4 >> 9 11.14 0.27 1. Nd4 Rxd5 2. Nf3 Rbb5 3. Qa4 Bf4 >> 4. Nb6 Qb7 5. Nxd5 Nxd5 >> 9-> 11.22 0.27 1. Nd4 Rxd5 2. Nf3 Rbb5 3. Qa4 Bf4 >> 4. Nb6 Qb7 5. Nxd5 Nxd5 (s=6) >> 10 11.73 0.19 1. Nd4 Rxd5 2. Nf3 Rbb5 3. Qa4 Rb7 >> 4. Qxd7 Rxd7 5. Rxd5 Nxd5 6. Rxd5 Bh2+ >> 7. Kxh2 Rxd5 (s=5) >> 10-> 15.25 0.19 1. Nd4 Rxd5 2. Nf3 Rbb5 3. Qa4 Rb7 >> 4. Qxd7 Rxd7 5. Rxd5 Nxd5 6. Rxd5 Bh2+ >> 7. Kxh2 Rxd5 (s=3) >> 11 19.54 0.46 1. Nd4 Bf4 2. Nxb5 Bxd2 3. Nbd6 Bf4 >> 4. Nf7+ Kg8 5. d6 Nc6 6. Nce5 Bh2+ >> 7. Kxh2 fxe5 (s=2) >> 11-> 20.61 0.46 1. Nd4 Bf4 2. Nxb5 Bxd2 3. Nbd6 Bf4 >> 4. Nf7+ Kg8 5. d6 Nc6 6. Nce5 Bh2+ >> 7. Kxh2 fxe5 >> 12 24.07 0.65 1. Nd4 Bf4 2. Nxb5 Bxd2 3. Nbd6 Bf4 >> 4. Nf7+ Kg8 5. d6 Nd5 6. Rxd5 Kxf7 >> 7. Qf3 Bg5 >> 12-> 26.50 0.65 1. Nd4 Bf4 2. Nxb5 Bxd2 3. Nbd6 Bf4 >> 4. Nf7+ Kg8 5. d6 Nd5 6. Rxd5 Kxf7 >> 7. Qf3 Bg5 >> 13 54.34 0.58 1. Nd4 R5b7 2. Nc6 Rc8 3. Re1 Bc5 4. >> Nxe7 Bxe7 5. d6 Bf8 6. Rd5 Rc6 7. Red1 >> f5 >> 13-> 58.25 0.58 1. Nd4 R5b7 2. Nc6 Rc8 3. Re1 Bc5 4. >> Nxe7 Bxe7 5. d6 Bf8 6. Rd5 Rc6 7. Red1 >> f5 >> 14 1:28 0.61 1. Nd4 Bf4 2. d6 Bxd2 3. dxe7 Rc5 4. >> Nxd2 Qxe7 5. Nc4 Rg5 6. Ne3 Rc8 7. >> Ndc2 Rb5 8. Nd5 >> 14-> 1:44 0.61 1. Nd4 Bf4 2. d6 Bxd2 3. dxe7 Rc5 4. >> Nxd2 Qxe7 5. Nc4 Rg5 6. Ne3 Rc8 7. >> Ndc2 Rb5 8. Nd5 >>? 15 2:00 1/45* 1. Nd4 >>White(1): ? >> time=2:11 cpu=189% mat=0 n=186867579 fh=92% nps=1.42M >> ext-> chk=4433139 cap=437585 pp=232534 1rep=621903 mate=55751 >> predicted=1 nodes=186867579 evals=35612226 50move=0 >> endgame tablebase-> probes=0 hits=0 >> SMP-> split=749 stop=123 data=4/128 cpu=4:09 elap=2:11 >> >> >> >>>> >>>>[Event "40-80"] >>>>[Site "Howick"] >>>>[Date "2004.05.02"] >>>>[Round "4.2"] >>>>[White "CM9000 Judge"] >>>>[Black "Shredder 8"] >>>>[TimeControl "0/4800"] >>>>[Result "1-0"] >>>>[ECO "C08"] >>>> >>>>1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 c5 4.exd5 exd5 5.Ngf3 a6 6.Be2 c4 7.O-O Bd6 8.b3 >>>>cxb3 9.axb3 Nc6 10.Re1 Nge7 11.c3 O-O 12.Bd3 Bf5 13.Nf1 Qd7 14.Ne3 Bxd3 >>>>15.Qxd3 Rfe8 16.c4 Rad8 17.Bd2 f6 18.Qc2 Kh8 19.Ra4 Rc8 20.Qd1 Bc7 >>>>21.Qa1 a5 22.Ra2 Rb8 23.Rc2 dxc4 24.bxc4 b5 25.cxb5 Rxb5 26.Rec1 Bd6 >>>>27.Qa4 Reb8 28.d5 Nb4 29.Bxb4 axb4 30.Nd4 R5b7 31.Qb3 Ra8 32.Nc6 Re8 >>>>33.Rd1 Rb6 34.Nd4 Rbb8 35.h3 Rb7 36.Ne6 Rb5 37.Rcd2 Ra8 38.Nc4 Rab8 >>>>39.Nd4 Rxd5 40.Ne3 Re5 41.Ndc2 Nc8 42.Nc4 Qe6 43.Qd3 b3 44.N2e3 b2 >>>>45.Nxe5 Qxe5 46.Rb1 Qh2+ 47.Kf1 Bf8 48.Rdxb2 Rxb2 49.Rxb2 Ne7 50.Ra2 Qb8 >>>>51.Qe4 Kg8 52.Ra8 Qb5+ 53.Ke1 Kf7 54.Ra7 Qc5 55.Rb7 Kg8 56.Qc4+ Qxc4 >>>>57.Nxc4 Kf7 58.Ke2 Ke6 59.Rb6+ Kd7 60.Rb8 Nc8 61.Rb7+ Ke6 62.f4 Be7 >>>>63.g4 g6 64.Kf3 h6 65.Rc7 Nd6 66.Nxd6 Bxd6 67.Rh7 Bf8 68.h4 f5 69.g5 h5 >>>>70.Kg3 Bc5 71.Rg7 1-0 >>>> >>>>jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.