Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Let's talk about fraud.

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 08:51:24 05/03/04

On May 03, 2004 at 11:04:59, Anthony Cozzie wrote:

>As a physicist, you consider all numbers within an order of magnitude as equal
>;)

Then you are not a physicist, but an engineer :)

As a physicist, you care first and foremost about the error analysis of
the results (which immediately allows you to conclude whether they are
identical or not). Ever seen any error margins in a computer chess paper?

--
GCP

Re: Let's talk about fraud. martin fierz 16:04:34 05/03/04
- Re: Let's talk about fraud. Robert Hyatt 19:50:58 05/03/04
  - Re: Let's talk about fraud. martin fierz 04:11:15 05/04/04
    - Re: Let's talk about fraud. Robert Hyatt 08:42:19 05/04/04
    - Re: Let's talk about fraud. Rolf Tueschen 04:32:01 05/04/04
      - Re: Let's talk about fraud. martin fierz 07:49:42 05/04/04
        
        Re: Let's talk about fraud. Rolf Tueschen 13:30:58 05/04/04
        
        Re: Let's talk about fraud. martin fierz 15:27:41 05/04/04
        
        Re: Let's talk about fraud. Rolf Tueschen 15:33:46 05/04/04
        
        Re: Let's talk about fraud. Robert Hyatt 10:44:21 05/04/04
        
        Re: Let's talk about fraud. martin fierz 15:21:07 05/04/04
        
        Re: Let's talk about fraud. Robert Hyatt 18:06:30 05/04/04
        
        Re: Let's talk about fraud. martin fierz 01:44:19 05/05/04
        
        Re: Let's talk about fraud. Robert Hyatt 08:35:34 05/05/04
        
        A more meaningful test? Matthew Hull 07:25:23 05/05/04
        
        Re: A more meaningful test? Robert Hyatt 08:37:50 05/05/04
        
        Re: A more meaningful test? Matthew Hull 09:12:59 05/05/04
        
        Re: A more meaningful test? Robert Hyatt 09:21:31 05/05/04
        
        Re: A more meaningful test? Matthew Hull 09:25:36 05/05/04
        
        Re: A more meaningful test? Robert Hyatt 10:02:26 05/05/04
        
        Re: A more meaningful test? Matthew Hull 07:29:48 05/05/04
        
        Re: A more meaningful test? Rolf Tueschen 07:41:38 05/05/04
        
        Re: A more meaningful test? Matthew Hull 08:02:08 05/05/04
        
        Re: A more meaningful test? martin fierz 03:03:21 05/06/04
        
        Re: A more meaningful test? Robert Hyatt 09:08:38 05/06/04
        
        Re: Let's talk about fraud. Basics Rolf Tueschen 02:00:59 05/05/04
Re: Let's talk about fraud. Anthony Cozzie 09:04:49 05/03/04
- Re: Let's talk about fraud. Gian-Carlo Pascutto 09:19:36 05/03/04
  - Re: Let's talk about fraud. Robert Hyatt 10:00:12 05/03/04
  - Re: Let's talk about fraud. Anthony Cozzie 09:34:22 05/03/04
  - Re: Let's talk about fraud. Rolf Tueschen 09:27:52 05/03/04
- Re: Let's talk about fraud. Robert Hyatt 09:06:35 05/03/04

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.