Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 13:30:58 05/04/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 04, 2004 at 10:49:42, martin fierz wrote: >i don't know why you think you have to stand up and defend bob every time >somebody says something about him you don't like. just leave that up to him. he >can take it :-) > >cheers > martin Because this is a case of principles. I saw how Vincent treated Bob for long. I read how the Levy/Herigk organization reacted on Bob's relevant critics. I smell something and although I am as far from being an expert in CC as Bob is an expert I can analyse the logic of arguments in special if it comes to data and statistics. Of course can defend himself. In special when he doesn't have to defend at all. But it's simply stinking when I watch how nobody from the clique of programmers says something about all the topics. Finally I react as academic. I must do ROTFL every time I read something about the participation in those Wch and other events and the prejudices about the net. Veritable GM play online but programmers of chessprograms want to _operate_ ten days and longer! It is nasty now I know, but don't they have a regular job? Or are they so rich that they can do that at will. Or do they convince their institutions that operating a chessprogram needed the programmer themselves? (I know that the "rules" of the ICCA require that. But is it not laughable?) Yes, for all that I write. If only one single famous and successful programmer would write in defense of Bob I were somewhere else. But this is so mean and indecent. Perhaps I write also because I like this man who has so much heart blood for computerchess.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.