Author: Odd Gunnar Malin
Date: 09:12:10 05/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 04, 2004 at 16:39:26, Odd Gunnar Malin wrote: >On May 04, 2004 at 10:42:45, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>Shredder classic is about 150 points weaker than Shredder 8 according to the >>betatesters. since Shredder 8 is at most 50 elopoints stronger you can expect >>that Shredder classic is at least 100 points weaker than 7.04 >> >>regards Joachim > >Hi > >I did a quick nunn2 match between Shredder Classic and Shredder 6.02 >(Padderborn). Timecontrol was 5 min/game on a 850MHz PIII with 32MB tt for both, >ponder off. > >Result: >Shredder Classic - Shredder 6.02 19.0-21.0 (+11,=16,-13) TP=-17 Elo >68%->[-71,+19], 95%->[-128,+57] >(Numbers from Shredder Classic (gui)) > >I have not too much faith in sudden death games between comps. When I look at >the play in longer (long=many moves) games the result seems to be much by >'luck'. The score can swing +-2 points at the end. As a match the result is ok, >but that wasn't the test. >I run the same setup with 5'+10 to compare. > >Odd Gunnar The result of the 5'+10 match was: Shredder Classic - Shredder 6.02 23.0-17.0 (+16,=14,-10) TP=+52 Elo 68%->[+10,+102], 95%->[-31,+156] (Numbers still from Shredder Classic gui) Games: Match 1 http://norbase.sjakk.biz/pgnlist.php?inter=12&lang=en&headline=7&pgnfile=match1.pgn Match 2 http://norbase.sjakk.biz/pgnlist.php?inter=12&lang=en&headline=7&pgnfile=match2.pgn So it is good enough, and more too, for my usage. I don't think I will run more matches, but maybe some positional test suits to check out the knoweledge/speed parametre. Odd Gunnar
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.