Author: Lawrence S. Tamarkin
Date: 03:18:24 12/16/98
Go up one level in this thread
Yes, your right. We need someone (and/or many), who is creative, not just about their own concepts, but who can take the considered view of us posters, and put it all together, to create these new articles. I nominate a comedic genius like Mig. I know we probably won't get Mig, but someone else out there might want to take hold of this challenge. Fernando is great, but probably isn't making as many new contributions for the same reasons, of being already very busy with other matters... mrslug - the inkompetent chess software addict! On December 16, 1998 at 04:05:52, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >On December 16, 1998 at 02:33:31, Lawrence S. Tamarkin wrote: > >>I've noticed that the frequency of new entries to the Resource Center have >>become somwhat infrequent. I'm part of the blame for this, as I rarely can find >>the energy to create a program review, even though I want too. >> >>But I've got an idea; posting here on the Computer-Chess Club is much more >>frequent and interactive. Perhaps some kind of Borg like, 'Assimulation' of >>many, many post can be made by a dilligent enough person, made into articles for >>there, and then posted!? Perhaps we can take the many hundreds of post about >>CM6000, merge together the most illuminating information, & then have the >>ultimate review of the product, tech support, (and/or lack off), and any other >>munitia about it, put together for postarity and review, long after the thread >>has died... >> >>mrslug - the inkompetent chess software addict! > >Excellent idea, a CCC review made of of bits of many members opinions. > >Posts like women in computer chess, and software like CM6000, somebody can >compile the views and opinions and put them all together. I think a great idea, >the computer Chess Resource centre is becoming a place I do not visit very often >anymore, due to the lack of anything new coming in. > >I think there should be more computer chess commentaries in their too, to make >flow more opnions. > >I think women in computer chess I would find interesting to hear about, maybe >some on here who frequents big computer tournaments could give interviews to the >women that are there then write a commentary and form some type of across the >board opinion on it. > >As well this could be done in other area's of topics. If I was able to string a >few words together that would make sense I would try it, but my experience in >writing things like this is limited. So I wish someone like Fernando who has >written reviews and interviews could put something like that together, or any >other member with experience in this type of thing .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.