Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 12:46:11 05/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 05, 2004 at 14:48:50, Dann Corbit wrote: >On May 05, 2004 at 14:46:39, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On May 05, 2004 at 12:47:59, steven blincoe wrote: >> >>>at what point(if ever)are members asked to take a thread offline here and >>>continue it through personal emails? >>> >>>i am obvioulsy referring to the never-ending thread about the Crafty-Hyatt >>>speedup results. >>> >>>now i realize that the thread is certainly "on-topic" but it really has >>>degenerated into nothing more then a series of personal attacks,insults,name >>>calling and finger pointing..and this was about 3 days ago! >>> >>>is this thread allowed to run on and on because well known programers are >>>involved? >>>would it be allowed to spin out of control this way if it were two lesser know >>>programmers ? >>>would it be allowed to go on an on "ad nasuem" if it were not chess programmers >>>at all?? >> >>Some of the posts are on the border of moderation. >> >>My suggestion is: >>Stop reading it! >> >>Here is the thread boiled down to a few sentences (paraphrazing): >> >>start: >>Antagonist> You said Crafty was .7x faster but it is only .6x faster with each >>new thread! >>Proagonist> Well, my off-the cuff remark is approximately correct. Within my >>measurement certainty at least. >>Antagonist> You swore on a stack of Bibles it was .7x!!!!! You chisled it on >>stone tablets and swore a solemn oath! >>Proagonist> Did not. >>Antagonist> Did so! >>Go to start. >> >>Now anyone who has not read it can save themselves some time. > >Hmmm.. I spelled "Protagonist" as "Proagonist". I wonder if it was a Freudian >slip. If you had spelled "antagonist" as "Moron" _that_ would have been a Freudian slip...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.