Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 18:31:44 05/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 05, 2004 at 21:05:44, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On May 05, 2004 at 19:58:39, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On May 05, 2004 at 19:46:26, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On May 05, 2004 at 19:16:58, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On May 05, 2004 at 18:43:47, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>No one cares for kicking crafty a few games online. You'll quote that you won in >>>>1997. Everyone cares if it is a $1000 proposal. >>> >>> >>>Just announce it. I suspect it will draw a big crowd. Something you might not >>>exactly want of course... >> >>I'm announcing it here and now a match crafty - diep, > > >Announce anything you want. You always do. You'll never make it happen >however. Just lots and lots of hot air and changing subjects... Oh well i daily make contracts. all what is needed is a signature from you. If you are going to avoid such a much until eternities then there is no serious contest to look at of course. What we do know is that you won't show up at a world championship because you need to work at 4th of july... ...and me stupid european guessing that is a holiday day there like 5th of may is for us (celeberating Russians crushed Hitler and Canadians liberated Netherlands) :) Let me make a contract real soon. You'll have it before sunday. I doubt though we'll ever see a signature of you there. > > >> >>You just keep giving excuses: collecting the money now. >> >>We can make an official contract, no problem. if you are prepared to sign a >>contract then neither of us can withdraw. i could sue you to get the $1000, you >>can sue me to get the $1000 in case it doesn't get paid. >> >>How about that? >> >>[snip] >> >>p.s. it seems that your word doesn't seem to count when you post results in CCC. >>postings in icca have been proven fraud already. > >Absolutely _no_ fraud has been proven whatsoever. Except in your fertile No you just 'wrote over' your speedup numbers from 'somewhere' unknown and calculated from that the search times which were published ICCA 1997. Let's just refer to the discussion here in august 2002 at CCC for a proof of statistical facts that they are not accurate. Only after 50 people here said: "these numbers cannot be true" you finally admitted that. I wonder whether people in USA are allowed to be professor publishing such papers...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.