Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:33:08 05/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 05, 2004 at 21:31:44, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On May 05, 2004 at 21:05:44, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On May 05, 2004 at 19:58:39, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On May 05, 2004 at 19:46:26, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On May 05, 2004 at 19:16:58, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 05, 2004 at 18:43:47, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>No one cares for kicking crafty a few games online. You'll quote that you won in >>>>>1997. Everyone cares if it is a $1000 proposal. >>>> >>>> >>>>Just announce it. I suspect it will draw a big crowd. Something you might not >>>>exactly want of course... >>> >>>I'm announcing it here and now a match crafty - diep, >> >> >>Announce anything you want. You always do. You'll never make it happen >>however. Just lots and lots of hot air and changing subjects... > >Oh well i daily make contracts. all what is needed is a signature from you. If >you are going to avoid such a much until eternities then there is no serious >contest to look at of course. What we do know is that you won't show up at a >world championship because you need to work at 4th of july... ...and me stupid >european guessing that is a holiday day there like 5th of may is for us >(celeberating Russians crushed Hitler and Canadians liberated Netherlands) :) I don't work on the 4th. However I do work on the 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th. Not to mention the 1st and the last 4 days of June. Get it now??? > >Let me make a contract real soon. You'll have it before sunday. > >I doubt though we'll ever see a signature of you there. You already know you won't. I've told you why. > >> >> >>> >>>You just keep giving excuses: collecting the money now. >>> >>>We can make an official contract, no problem. if you are prepared to sign a >>>contract then neither of us can withdraw. i could sue you to get the $1000, you >>>can sue me to get the $1000 in case it doesn't get paid. >>> >>>How about that? >>> >>>[snip] >>> >>>p.s. it seems that your word doesn't seem to count when you post results in CCC. >>>postings in icca have been proven fraud already. >> >>Absolutely _no_ fraud has been proven whatsoever. Except in your fertile > >No you just 'wrote over' your speedup numbers from 'somewhere' unknown and >calculated from that the search times which were published ICCA 1997. Let's just >refer to the discussion here in august 2002 at CCC for a proof of statistical >facts that they are not accurate. Only after 50 people here said: "these numbers >cannot be true" you finally admitted that. Wrong. First 50 people didn't even post in the thread. You never made it clear in our off-line conversations what you were talking about. I only considered the speedup numbers... Once it became apparent what you were talking about when you went public, and one of my partners realized what you were talking about, I immediately responded... > >I wonder whether people in USA are allowed to be professor publishing such >papers... I wonder how you manage to stay out of jail where you live???
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.