Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Is chessmaster6000 with selective search=10 a better solver?

Author: blass uri

Date: 08:33:01 12/16/98

I tested chessmaster6000 and chessmaster6000 with selective search=10 in the
following position:

8/1n6/r3k3/P4p1p/R2Rp1p1/6P1/2rB1PP1/4K3 w - - 0 1

I gave chessmaster6000 Junior5's move against chessmaster6000:
56.Rab4
and asked chessmaster6000 for the best move
The target is to avoid 56...Nxa5(chessmaster6000 failed in achieving this target
in the game against Junior5)

The default personality(selective search=6) finds 56...Nxa5 after 106 minutes
when the selective search=10 finds it after  only 18 minutes.

I used pentium200MMX with windows95 and 64 MBytes hash tables for
chessmaster6000

Uri

Re: Is chessmaster6000 with selective search=10 a better solver? James Robertson 09:11:11 12/16/98
- Re: Is chessmaster6000 with selective search=10 a better solver? Kai Lübke 05:14:47 12/17/98
  - Re: Is chessmaster6000 with selective search=10 a better solver? Ralph E. Carter 16:25:26 12/17/98

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.