Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Is chessmaster6000 with selective search=10 a better solver?

Author: James Robertson

Date: 09:11:11 12/16/98

Go up one level in this thread

On December 16, 1998 at 11:33:01, blass uri wrote:

>I tested chessmaster6000 and chessmaster6000 with selective search=10 in the
>following position:
>
>8/1n6/r3k3/P4p1p/R2Rp1p1/6P1/2rB1PP1/4K3 w - - 0 1
>
>I gave chessmaster6000 Junior5's move against chessmaster6000:
>56.Rab4
>and asked chessmaster6000 for the best move
>The target is to avoid 56...Nxa5(chessmaster6000 failed in achieving this target
>in the game against Junior5)
>
>The default personality(selective search=6) finds 56...Nxa5 after 106 minutes
>when the selective search=10 finds it after  only 18 minutes.
>
>I used pentium200MMX with windows95 and 64 MBytes hash tables for
>chessmaster6000
>
>Uri

I heard somewhere that someone found a way to increase selective search beyond
10, with even better results.

James

• Re: Is chessmaster6000 with selective search=10 a better solver? Kai Lübke 05:14:47 12/17/98
  • Re: Is chessmaster6000 with selective search=10 a better solver? Ralph E. Carter 16:25:26 12/17/98

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.