Author: margolies,marc
Date: 21:31:17 05/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
i don't know if reconcilliation is a good or bad thing in this case. a happy chess board might lighten my reading load too much. i suppose a little contraversy clears out the cobwebs here. On May 06, 2004 at 15:58:33, Dan Honeycutt wrote: >On May 05, 2004 at 14:48:27, steven blincoe wrote: > >>hi Dan >> >>>I agree Steve that a lot of the "he said", "where did I say" stuff is dull but >>>there is a lot of information in that thread that I found very interesting, >>>especially since I know next to zip about SMP. >> >>yes the basis for my objection to the thread is the endless name >>calling,accusations,and general "flame like"flavor of the postings..running >>unabated for what is 4 days now. >>but i guess its not possible to moderate out of the thread those postings where >>the content is purely a personal attack and those that are informative in nature >>so it will have to be an "all or nothing all "approach to moderation i guess >> >>just cant help thinking that if the members posting this way were not so well >>known..somehow this thread would have been axed a long time ago.. >>but perhaps im wrong.. >> >> >> >>Regards >>Steve > >You're probably right and the moderator responses seem to concur. Very few >members have the knowledge to contribute like Bob and Vincent so, until such >time as there is a reconciliation (not holding my breath), I'll go on looking >for the gems of information by sifting through the ashes from the flames. > >Dan H.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.