Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 02:18:30 05/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 05, 2004 at 17:42:29, James Swafford wrote: >On May 05, 2004 at 16:32:13, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On May 05, 2004 at 12:42:24, James Swafford wrote: >> >>Why don't you get a member of ICGA/ICCA and look for yourself? > >Because I don't care if he did or not. I simply stated that >YOU have backed yourself into a corner by: >1. claiming Hyatt published something >2. being asked to support such claim >3. Refusing to do so (or retract your statement) > >Seriously- you should cite your reference or admit you >were wrong =about that point=, or you're going to lose >credibility. This would suggest... -elc. > >Do you stand behind your words or not? (Hint: it's a binary >question.) > >-- >James > > > >> >>Hyatt should learn to work with objective speedup numbers instead of >>denying that a 30 position test at his own quad is insignificant. >> >> >> >>>On May 05, 2004 at 07:53:14, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On May 04, 2004 at 11:49:49, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>I asked for a specific citation for "the JICCA paper" you claimed I wrote and >>>>>gave the speedup = 1 + (NCPUS -1) * .7; formula, and also where I claimed it was >>>>>good for _any number_ of cpus. >>>>> >>>>>I know that (a) I didn't write any paper on the Crafty algorithm yet; (b) that >>>> >>>>YOU DENY THAT YOU WROTE A PAPER PUBLISHED IN ICGA/ICCA ABOUT CRAFTY WHERE YOU >>>>CLAIM A 1 + 0.7 (N-1) SPEEDUP? >>>> >>>>>I have _always_ said that my formula is an approximation that works with up to 8 >>>>>processors. >>>> >>>>it says N for N processors and some posts from you a few years ago indicated it >>>>also worked for N=16. >>>> >>>>>Anything beyond that is your imagination.. >>>>>Time to admit it. >>>> >>>>It has been proven not to be working for n=4 even. >>>> >>>>>The CCC search engine is available for you to hunt for posts where I claimed >>>>>that after you verify there was no JICCA paper whatsoever. >>>>>I've called you a liar. >>>>>Disprove it or run as you always do... >>>> >>>>You publish an OFFICIAL paper in the journal of icga and now you claim you >>>>didn't write it. It's time to use some of the posts you do here to proof to your >>>>government you deny your own papers (about crafty) and commit fraud (in the dts >>>>paper) as a professor. >>>> >>> >>> >>>Wow Vincent. I think you could've retracted your statement up until >>>now... seems you've put yourself in a tight spot. >>> >>>Why don't you cool off a bit, retract that statement (or prove it?), >>>and we can all move on. >>> >>>-- >>>James >>> >>> >>> >>>>>You like to use the "fraud" word. I think it is _obvious_ who is the "fraud" >>>>>here... Of course you can prove your statement and make me out the fraud again. >>>>> >>>>>Your move. Clock is ticking.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.