Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 09:11:29 05/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 07, 2004 at 11:37:00, Robert Hyatt wrote: >I later ran the entire CB test set with and without as you well know. I'll repeat, I don't have any logs from you from that (lying around), and I got no reply to my request to (re)send them. The only big test I have from you is the Opteron one that was just recently posted. >You and Vincent are hung up on a >single number. You get 2.8 so 3.0 or 3.1 is "dead wrong" to use Vincent's >words, even though there is enough variability to choke a mule. > >In any case, _I_ understand the issue and it doesn't cause me any grief. I >don't have to get the same number each time myself... Excuse me, but *who exactly* used proper statistics to illustrate how variable the results *were* or *were not*? -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.