Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 15:49:49 05/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 06, 2004 at 13:55:24, Matthew Hull wrote: >[snip] > >> >>If i win with DIEP i'll have a world title or a tournament victory. >> >>A program that used to end #5 in world and is bigtime improved now and which >>profits from fast pc hardware and is continuesly getting improved. > >[Event "ICS Rated Standard match"] >[Site "ICC"] >[Date "2004.05.03"] >[Round "-"] >[White "bodo"] >[Black "DIEP"] >[Result "1-0"] >[WhiteElo "2383"] >[BlackElo "2491"] >[TimeControl "1800+30"] > >1. c4 black out of book now, boundschecker with debug info turned on, in order to debug a problem i had. - Thanks for posting an online game. b.t.w. who cares for online games? Nf6 2. Nf3 b6 3. g3 Bb7 4. Bg2 Nc6 5. O-O g6 6. Nc3 Bg7 7. d4 O-O 8. >e4 d6 9. e5 dxe5 10. Nxe5 Na5 11. Bxb7 Nxb7 12. Re1 e6 13. Qf3 Nd6 14. Bg5 >h6 15. Nc6 Qd7 16. Bxf6 Bxf6 17. Qxf6 Qxc6 18. b3 Qd7 19. d5 Rae8 20. Re5 >Kh7 21. Rae1 c6 22. dxc6 Qxc6 23. h4 Nf5 24. Ne4 Qc7 25. c5 Rd8 26. Kh1 Ne7 >27. cxb6 axb6 28. h5 Nc6 29. Rb5 Qb7 30. Kg2 Ne7 31. f3 Nf5 32. hxg6+ fxg6 >33. Qxe6 Qg7 34. Rxb6 Rc8 35. Nf6+ Kh8 36. Qe5 Rc7 37. Qb2 Rfc8 38. Re2 >Ne3+ 39. Kh3 Re7 40. Qd2 Nf5 41. Ree6 Rf8 42. Qc3 Rxe6 43. Rxe6 Ne7 44. Qe3 >Rf7 45. Qb6 Qf8 46. Nd7 Qc8 47. Qd4+ Kg8 48. Nf6+ Kg7 49. Qe5 Ng8 50. Ne8+ >Kf8 51. Nd6 Qd7 52. Kg2 Re7 53. Rxe7 Qxe7 54. Qf4+ Kg7 55. Ne4 Qa3 56. Qc7+ >Kh8 57. Qc2 Kh7 58. Qd2 Ne7 59. Qd7 Kg7 60. Kh3 Kf7 61. Nd6+ Kf6 62. Ne8+ >Kf7 63. Nc7 Kg7 64. b4 Qxf3 65. Qxe7+ Kh8 66. Qe5+ Kh7 67. Nd5 Qf1+ 68. Kg4 >Qd1+ 69. Kf4 Qf1+ 70. Ke3 Qe1+ 71. Kd4 Qa1+ 72. Nc3 h5 73. Qc7+ Kh6 74. >Qf4+ Kh7 75. a4 Qg1+ 76. Qe3 Qa1 77. a5 Qb2 78. Kc4 Qg2 79. Qe7+ Kh6 80. >Qf8+ Kh7 81. Nd5 g5 82. Qf7+ Kh6 83. Qf6+ Kh7 84. Ne7 Qc2+ 85. Kd5 Qd3+ 86. >Kc5 Qe3+ 87. Kc6 Qe4+ 88. Kc7 Qc4+ 89. Kd8 Qd3+ 90. Ke8 Qe4 91. Qf7+ Kh6 >92. Qf8+ Kh7 93. Qg8+ Kh6 94. Qh8+ Qh7 95. Ng8+ Kg6 96. Qf6# > >[Event "ICS Unrated Standard match"] >[Site "ICC"] >[Date "2004.04.11"] >[Round "-"] >[White "DIEP"] >[Black "Celes"] >[Result "0-1"] >[WhiteElo "2510"] >[BlackElo "2175"] >[TimeControl "1800+180"] > >1. c4 e5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nxd4 Bb4 6. Bg5 h6 7. Bh4 O-O >8. e3 g5 9. Bg3 Ne4 10. Qc2 Nxd4 11. Qxe4 Bxc3+ 12. bxc3 Ne6 13. Qf5 Ng7 >14. Qd5 d6 15. c5 Qf6 16. Qd4 Qxd4 17. cxd4 dxc5 18. dxc5 c6 19. Bd6 Rd8 >20. h4 Nf5 21. hxg5 Nxd6 22. cxd6 hxg5 23. O-O-O Be6 24. Rd2 Kg7 25. Be2 >Rd7 26. g3 Rad8 27. Rhd1 f5 28. Bf3 Kf6 29. Bg2 g4 30. e4 fxe4 31. Bxe4 a6 >32. f4 gxf3 33. Bxf3 Kg5 34. Re2 Bf5 35. g4 Bg6 36. Rb2 Rf8 37. Be2 Rf2 38. >Rdd2 Be4 39. Rb6 Kf6 40. Bc4 Rf4 41. g5+ Kxg5 42. Kb2 Kf5 43. Bb3 Ke5 44. >Rxb7 Rxb7 45. d7 Rb8 46. d8=Q Rxd8 47. Rxd8 Rf2+ 48. Kc3 Bb1 49. Kb4 Bxa2 >* > >[Event "ICS Rated Standard match"] >[Site "ICC"] >[Date "2004.04.09"] >[Round "-"] >[White "crafty"] >[Black "DIEP"] >[Result "1-0"] >[WhiteElo "2555"] >[BlackElo "2491"] >[TimeControl "1800+30"] > >1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 d5 4. cxd5 Nxd5 5. e4 Nxc3 6. bxc3 c5 7. Bc4 Bg7 >8. Ne2 cxd4 9. cxd4 Nc6 10. Be3 O-O 11. O-O Na5 12. Bd3 b6 13. Rc1 e6 14. >Qd2 Bb7 15. Bh6 Qe7 16. Bxg7 Kxg7 17. Qf4 Rac8 18. h4 Nc6 19. d5 exd5 20. >exd5 Ne5 21. Be4 Ba6 22. Rxc8 Rxc8 23. Re1 Re8 24. h5 f5 25. Bxf5 gxf5 26. >Nd4 Kh8 27. Kh1 Qf7 28. Qxf5 Qxf5 29. Nxf5 Bc4 30. f4 Bxd5 31. a3 Rg8 32. >Rxe5 Bxg2+ 33. Kh2 Bf3 34. h6 Rg2+ 35. Kh3 Rg6 36. Re8+ Rg8 37. Rxg8+ Kxg8 >38. Kh4 Kf7 39. Kg5 a5 40. Nd4 Bd5 41. Kf5 Bc4 42. a4 Ke7 43. Ke5 Bf7 44. >f5 Bc4 45. Ne6 b5 46. f6+ Kf7 47. Ng5+ Kg6 48. axb5 a4 49. Kd4 a3 50. Kxc4 >a2 51. f7 a1=Q 52. f8=Q Qc1+ 53. Kd5 > > > >> >>This you want to see play against some program where in eval and search (not >>counting parallel search where nalimov seems to have done some effort) the last >>few years a few bytes per so many months change and which never impressed in >>world champs either, losing in fact in 2000 in the 100% same way like in >>Jakarta. >> >>No one cares if i beat crafty. >> >>I definitely do not find it worth my effort to do a public match without that i >>get compensated for my time. >> >>Look Bob never will say: "this match proofs something". >> >>No he will say: "look i beated you online at bullet level in 1997". >> >>That's the whole point. >> >>What do i proof beating crafty? >> >>Well i proof that i'm better than number 30 from the world or so. >> >>But we already knew that.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.