Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:37:00 05/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 08, 2004 at 21:14:04, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On May 08, 2004 at 21:04:19, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >You are just flaming as usual. > >Show us the outputs of cray blitz. No one beliefs you. Your thesis is unfindable >too. Show it. It is available through University Microfilm. I've told you that previously. I have hard copy. Remember that I once told you all my files were lost??? That would include _all_ of my files, including the electronic copy of my thesis. But if you can figure out how to contact university microfilm, they can provide what you want. > Show the source code of cray blitz. You had a posting previous >week indicating you have it. Show the source of your program... I have a printout. 66 lines X 2 columns, front and back. 60,000 lines of FORTRAN. 22,000 lines of ASM. That is all I have as I have said repeatedly.. > >Yes i can read assembly no problem. Yes i can read fortran code, no problem. > Amazing. You can't seem to read anything else, "no problem". IE the JICCA. Apparently you read an article I never wrote. CCC. Apparently you read a post I never made. So you can "read no problem"? I think you have _big_ problems myself... >You know i'm not a beginner in parallel search, i can see from your code already >how well it would parallel work. Ah yes. You hit the nail right on the head with Crafty didn't you? No speedup on a dual. Terrible speedup on a quad. Etc. So I am sure you "can see from my code how well it would work." I am _way_ more experienced than you at parallel search and _I_ won't claim to be able to do that... (look at someone's code and accurately predict speedups.) Neither can _you_... > >A year ago you posted you didn't have it. Now you post again you have it. I posted, but you seem to be unable to grasp the concept. I have a printout. I have _no_ source files. You can find that posted several times with the CCC search engine if you want... You _know_ that. Just more of your patented brand of dishonesty... So quit wasting time making up things I supposedly wrote but didn't, and spend more time reading what I actually wrote. Your idiocy index will drop markedly... > >In short. Show the cray blitz source code. > >We have waited long enough for it. Show the JICCA article citation you raved on and on about in _several_ posts. Show the quote where I claimed that my speedup formula was good for any number of processors. Show data to contradict the 18 opteron log files producing speedups reasonably close to what my linear formula predicts. Show data to show that Crafty can't run effectively on NUMA boxes when it appears to be doing just fine on the NUMA opteron. Show data to prove that Crafty is 10% slower because of the tree pointer. Show data to show how efficient _your_ parallel search. Show _anything_ in fact. You never do. Except of course you show lies. Fabrications. Nonesense. Dishonesty. You are good at showing those... I've shown _you_ all I intend to show. Now it's your turn to show me proof of some of the stupid claims you have made. Or it is your turn to once again run, switch subject, or hide, since you can't stand real data...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.