Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 16:24:12 12/16/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 1998 at 10:32:31, Harald Faber wrote: >On December 16, 1998 at 10:25:44, Dan Kiski wrote: > >>>>I hate to say it but a test of 20 or so games at one set time control don't >>>>prove anything regardless of games with other programs. >>> >>>Are you talking about my idea of testing CM against the other top programs? >> >>No, I was refering to cm6555 v cm cummings. > >With that he can play hundreds of games... :-) >Much more important are the games against other opponents. I do not think it is good to play other programs at other settings with CM6K untill the standard settings lose. But until then I would rather find some settings that are better than the standard ones, so when the day comes and CM loses to another program, there will be another CM sparring parnter to take its place And this thread is a good natured sparring thread of accepting the personality challenge (thats why there are many :-) all over the place.) So no need to state the obvious guys about playing so many games meaning whatever :-) When I stated I am currently trying to find the best settings, which I am, when I say I will find the best, it is like before a boxing match at the press conference. You throw allot of hot air about how good you are going to be, then you have to prove it :-) Cheer up guys, "I am the greatest, my settings float like a butterfly and sting like a bee" :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.