Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Aaron-comparison 2650 mhz to 2200 mhz to 2400 mhz

Author: Slater Wold

Date: 10:02:05 05/09/04

Go up one level in this thread


On May 09, 2004 at 12:14:00, Aaron Gordon wrote:

>On May 09, 2004 at 03:03:50, Slater Wold wrote:
>
>>On May 09, 2004 at 02:18:58, K. Burcham wrote:
>>
>>> [D] r1r1q1k1/6p1/3b1p1p/1p1PpP2/1Pp5/2P4P/R1B2QP1/R5K1 w - -
>>>
>>>>Athlon XP Barton (2500+, 1.83GHz) @ 2.65GHz:
>>>
>>>>Hiarcs 9 - 128mb hash
>>>>1.Qb6 Rxa2 2.Rxa2 Bc7 3.Qe6+ Kf8 4.Kf1 Qxe6
>>>>  ±  (1.02)   Depth: 14/41   00:01:18  25926kN
>>>>332.4kn/s
>>>
>>>Athlon 64 3400 (2200 mhz)
>>>
>>>Hiarcs 9  128mb hash
>>>1.Qb6 Rxa2 2.Rxa2 Bc7 3.Qe6+ Kf8 4.Kf1 Qxe6
>>>  ±  (1.02)   Depth: 14/41   00:01:15  25926kN
>>
>>AMD FX53 = 00:01:08
>
>Yep, thats smokin'. :) I'd like to wait until I get the $ as well as when AMD
>releases the 939 pin Athlon FX before I get one. That way I can use unregistered
>DDR mem & put the chip in one of the new "Nforce3-250Gb" boards. Supposedly can
>run @ 300fsb. :)

The Nforce FX boards suck.  VIA is killing them on every aspect.

Maybe that'll change...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.