Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 11:45:19 05/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 09, 2004 at 09:07:33, James T. Walker wrote: >On May 08, 2004 at 23:09:55, Mike Byrne wrote: > >>On May 08, 2004 at 21:42:11, James T. Walker wrote: >> >>>On May 07, 2004 at 12:22:05, steven blincoe wrote: >>> >>>>Dear pal: >>>> >>>>>Insults and wars in CTF, that worry so much some pals here, are just the >>>>>enveloppe >>>> >>>> >>>>tell me my freind >>>>what does a poster have to write or say in the CTF for it to be deleted? >>>> >>>>here the rules of what is or is not acceptable are pretty well delineated >>>> >>>>can you give me an example of a posting that would be considered unacceptable?? >>>>i of course do not need a word by word graphic example..just a basic idea would >>>>be fine >>>> >>>>Steve >>>> >>> >>>I can tell you that the rules here are nothing of the sort. They are subject to >>>the whim of the moderators. I had a post deleted here because I said I >>>suspected a poster of being under the influence of alcohol because of his >>>constant insulting post and constant unfounded statements. My "personal attack" >>>of the poster was only in the minds of the moderator that deleted my post. And >>>besides, what's wrong with dragging a few of the insulting people away from this >>>forum to somewhere they will be more at home? >>>Jim Walker >>> >>> >> >>Jim, >> >>I would be very careful what you post here. First - you cannot suspect of >>anyone usung alcohol when you all see is plain text message posted here on this >>forum. Last time I checked, the internet does not convey redshot eyes, slur >>speech, unsteady balance, blood tests etc. To say "suspect" is not a logical >>conclusion from the evidence that is available to you. >> >>The poster that you made referenced to, wrote to the moderators through the >>proper complaint channel (e-mail) and complained about your post. The poster >>you suspected of using alcohol does not drink alcolhol at all. So your >>"personal unfounded attack" was not simply a "only in the minds(sic) of the >>moderator" . >> >>If you do have a complaint about a post, please use the proper channels. We >>simply do not have time nor the desire to read every post. >> >>FYI, I was not the moderator that deleted your post - but all three of the >>moderators were on the same page - your post was deleted for all the correct >>reasons. >> >>We can take this to private e-mail if you wish to discuss further, >> >>Michael > >It is obviously useless to discuss this further. You have a mindset that a >suspicion is a personal attack. I can't change that. I have seen actual >personal attacks on this forum which have gone without being deleted. If all it >takes to get a post deleted is to complain about it then so be it. >I have no reason to "be very careful" what I post here. Since anything the >moderators don't like will be deleted anyway. If you want to ban me from here I >don't care. I was kicked off ICC for providing the customers with a needed >service but the operators there were not smart enough to see it. I'm still >surviving without ICC and I can survive without this forum. Do what you have to >do. >Jim "It is obviously useless to discuss this further' I agree, but for different reasons. Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.