Author: Aaron Gordon
Date: 16:52:03 05/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 09, 2004 at 13:02:05, Slater Wold wrote: >On May 09, 2004 at 12:14:00, Aaron Gordon wrote: > >>On May 09, 2004 at 03:03:50, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On May 09, 2004 at 02:18:58, K. Burcham wrote: >>> >>>> [D] r1r1q1k1/6p1/3b1p1p/1p1PpP2/1Pp5/2P4P/R1B2QP1/R5K1 w - - >>>> >>>>>Athlon XP Barton (2500+, 1.83GHz) @ 2.65GHz: >>>> >>>>>Hiarcs 9 - 128mb hash >>>>>1.Qb6 Rxa2 2.Rxa2 Bc7 3.Qe6+ Kf8 4.Kf1 Qxe6 >>>>> ± (1.02) Depth: 14/41 00:01:18 25926kN >>>>>332.4kn/s >>>> >>>>Athlon 64 3400 (2200 mhz) >>>> >>>>Hiarcs 9 128mb hash >>>>1.Qb6 Rxa2 2.Rxa2 Bc7 3.Qe6+ Kf8 4.Kf1 Qxe6 >>>> ± (1.02) Depth: 14/41 00:01:15 25926kN >>> >>>AMD FX53 = 00:01:08 >> >>Yep, thats smokin'. :) I'd like to wait until I get the $ as well as when AMD >>releases the 939 pin Athlon FX before I get one. That way I can use unregistered >>DDR mem & put the chip in one of the new "Nforce3-250Gb" boards. Supposedly can >>run @ 300fsb. :) > >The Nforce FX boards suck. VIA is killing them on every aspect. > >Maybe that'll change... Nah, thats the old Nforce. I'm talking about the Nforce3-250Gb. Not sure they're even out yet.. Anand reviewed one though and it was extremely fast. Made it up to a true 300mhz FSB too.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.