Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 01:18:26 05/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 10, 2004 at 03:28:37, F. Huber wrote:
>On May 09, 2004 at 18:02:57, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>On May 09, 2004 at 17:16:57, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>On May 09, 2004 at 16:31:48, Rob Basham wrote:
>>>
>>>>[D]2rqn3/5rbk/3p1n1p/p2Pp2P/1p1Nb3/4BNR1/PP1Q1P2/3BK1R1 w - - 0 1
>>>>
>>>>I added some more pieces to the neat "mother of combinations"
>>>>diagram below....:-)
>>>>
>>>>I think it is a mate in 9....even with the black queen still on the board...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>1. Bxh6.....etc.
>>>
>>>In this position it is Mate in 9, but with the original position it is a draw
>>>with good defense :-)
>>>
>>>
>>[Event "Shootout (Shredder8, Blitz:30'+3") "]
>>[Site "?"]
>>[Date "????.??.??"]
>>[Round "?"]
>>[White "New game"]
>>[Black "?"]
>>[Result "1-0"]
>>[SetUp "1"]
>>[FEN "2rqn3/5rbk/3p1n1p/p2Pp2P/1p1Nb3/4BNR1/PP1Q1P2/3BK1R1 w - - 0 1"]
>>[PlyCount "7"]
>>
>>1. Bxh6 {[%eval 801,13] [%emt 0:01:37]} Bxh6
>>2. Qxh6+ {[%eval 1026,17] [%emt 0:00:42]} Kxh6 {[%eval 1026,7] [%emt 0:00:00]}
>>3. Rg6+ {[%eval 1099,18] [%emt 0:01:10]} Bxg6 {[%eval 1099,24] [%emt 0:00:40]}
>>4. Rxg6+ {[%eval 1099,22] [%emt 0:01:17]} Kxh5 5. Nxe5+ Kh4 6. Rh6+ Kg5 7.
>>Nxf7+ Kf4 8. Rh4+ Ng4 9. Rxg4# 1-0
>
>After 4.Rxg6+ the black move 4.Kxh5 is a rather bad defense!
>Try 4... Kh7 and then look for a mate - you´ll not find any ...
>(except you´re better than Chest ;-))
>
>So this PV showing a ´mate in 9´ is definitely wrong!
>(I´m quite sure, that it´s no mate in 9 at all)
>
>
>Regards,
>Franz.
Did Chest ever found Mate at all?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.