Author: Frank Phillips
Date: 07:07:01 05/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 10, 2004 at 08:18:58, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 10, 2004 at 07:10:53, Ken Stone wrote: > >>On May 10, 2004 at 01:15:00, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>I read afterword in book store more carefully. And Hsu claims, that Deep Blue >>>was positionally in own class in comparison to Fritz/Junior and even tactically >>>better. But when Hsu has never played serious chess game himself I think his >>>comments are almost useless even if he is super engineer/programmer. >>> >>>Jouni >> >>He's both and engineer and scientist, and has knowledge of chess as well. >>Many on the Deep Blue Project were very good at chess. I don't doubt his claim, >>and I remeber the match, the machine showed tremendous skill and Kasparov >>himself said Deep Blue in '97 played like a 2800 player. >> >>Ken > >playing like 2800 player can be result of deeper search and not better >evaluation so the level of DB proves nothing about positional knowledge. > >Uri I agree: infinitely fast search and no positional knowledge would lead to perfect play. Come back Gilbert Ryle.........
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.