Author: Ken Stone
Date: 08:08:31 05/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 10, 2004 at 10:07:01, Frank Phillips wrote: >On May 10, 2004 at 08:18:58, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On May 10, 2004 at 07:10:53, Ken Stone wrote: >> >>>On May 10, 2004 at 01:15:00, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>I read afterword in book store more carefully. And Hsu claims, that Deep Blue >>>>was positionally in own class in comparison to Fritz/Junior and even tactically >>>>better. But when Hsu has never played serious chess game himself I think his >>>>comments are almost useless even if he is super engineer/programmer. >>>> >>>>Jouni >>> >>>He's both and engineer and scientist, and has knowledge of chess as well. >>>Many on the Deep Blue Project were very good at chess. I don't doubt his claim, >>>and I remeber the match, the machine showed tremendous skill and Kasparov >>>himself said Deep Blue in '97 played like a 2800 player. >>> >>>Ken >> >>playing like 2800 player can be result of deeper search and not better >>evaluation so the level of DB proves nothing about positional knowledge. >> >>Uri > >I agree: infinitely fast search and no positional knowledge would lead to >perfect play. > >Come back Gilbert Ryle......... If this is so, for sake of arguement, then it had superior positional play:-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.