Author: Frank Phillips
Date: 08:43:28 05/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 10, 2004 at 11:08:31, Ken Stone wrote: >On May 10, 2004 at 10:07:01, Frank Phillips wrote: > >>On May 10, 2004 at 08:18:58, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On May 10, 2004 at 07:10:53, Ken Stone wrote: >>> >>>>On May 10, 2004 at 01:15:00, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>> >>>>>I read afterword in book store more carefully. And Hsu claims, that Deep Blue >>>>>was positionally in own class in comparison to Fritz/Junior and even tactically >>>>>better. But when Hsu has never played serious chess game himself I think his >>>>>comments are almost useless even if he is super engineer/programmer. >>>>> >>>>>Jouni >>>> >>>>He's both and engineer and scientist, and has knowledge of chess as well. >>>>Many on the Deep Blue Project were very good at chess. I don't doubt his claim, >>>>and I remeber the match, the machine showed tremendous skill and Kasparov >>>>himself said Deep Blue in '97 played like a 2800 player. >>>> >>>>Ken >>> >>>playing like 2800 player can be result of deeper search and not better >>>evaluation so the level of DB proves nothing about positional knowledge. >>> >>>Uri >> >>I agree: infinitely fast search and no positional knowledge would lead to >>perfect play. >> >>Come back Gilbert Ryle......... > >If this is so, for sake of arguement, then it had superior positional play:-) Certainly superior play :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.