Author: Derek Paquette
Date: 13:21:12 05/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 10, 2004 at 11:43:28, Frank Phillips wrote: >On May 10, 2004 at 11:08:31, Ken Stone wrote: > >>On May 10, 2004 at 10:07:01, Frank Phillips wrote: >> >>>On May 10, 2004 at 08:18:58, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On May 10, 2004 at 07:10:53, Ken Stone wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 10, 2004 at 01:15:00, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>I read afterword in book store more carefully. And Hsu claims, that Deep Blue >>>>>>was positionally in own class in comparison to Fritz/Junior and even tactically >>>>>>better. But when Hsu has never played serious chess game himself I think his >>>>>>comments are almost useless even if he is super engineer/programmer. >>>>>> >>>>>>Jouni >>>>> >>>>>He's both and engineer and scientist, and has knowledge of chess as well. >>>>>Many on the Deep Blue Project were very good at chess. I don't doubt his claim, >>>>>and I remeber the match, the machine showed tremendous skill and Kasparov >>>>>himself said Deep Blue in '97 played like a 2800 player. >>>>> >>>>>Ken >>>> >>>>playing like 2800 player can be result of deeper search and not better >>>>evaluation so the level of DB proves nothing about positional knowledge. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>I agree: infinitely fast search and no positional knowledge would lead to >>>perfect play. >>> >>>Come back Gilbert Ryle......... >> >>If this is so, for sake of arguement, then it had superior positional play:-) > > >Certainly superior play :-) One could also argue it was the only man vs machine match kasparov wanted to win and not draw,
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.