Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Albillo "unsolved" some remarks

Author: Bernhard Bauer

Date: 23:22:12 05/10/04

Go up one level in this thread


On May 11, 2004 at 02:05:18, Martin Baumung wrote:

>Hi Jouni,
>
>>[D]3qk3/8/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQ -
>>
>>I am 99,9% this is mate in 11 by e4 as some engines claim. After 12 hours
>>computing Chest is analyzed both e4 and d4 without finding mate in 10 mate. Note
>>also, if we put knight, bishop or rook to d8 it's mate in 8, 8 or 9 with
>>e4 always!
>
>I've had some qualms too about that particular position - without any success so
>far :-( I begin to doubt it's a #11...
>
>>BTW if I analyze this complete with Chest is it analyzed first 14 piece TB??
>
>I think there are "some more" possibilities to arrange these 14 pieces on the
>board ;-)
>
>Cheers,
>
>Martin

these 14 pieces
===============
 fourteen ??? I guess you are a mathematician - these guys are famous for their
lack of ability to count.
Lets see: 2 rows with 8 pieces is 16
          minus 2 black pieces is 14 huh??

I'm confused

regards
Bernhard



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.