Author: Martin Baumung
Date: 23:48:01 05/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 2004 at 02:22:12, Bernhard Bauer wrote: >On May 11, 2004 at 02:05:18, Martin Baumung wrote: > >>Hi Jouni, >> >>>[D]3qk3/8/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQ - >>> >>>I am 99,9% this is mate in 11 by e4 as some engines claim. After 12 hours >>>computing Chest is analyzed both e4 and d4 without finding mate in 10 mate. Note >>>also, if we put knight, bishop or rook to d8 it's mate in 8, 8 or 9 with >>>e4 always! >> >>I've had some qualms too about that particular position - without any success so >>far :-( I begin to doubt it's a #11... >> >>>BTW if I analyze this complete with Chest is it analyzed first 14 piece TB?? >> >>I think there are "some more" possibilities to arrange these 14 pieces on the >>board ;-) >> >>Cheers, >> >>Martin > >these 14 pieces >=============== > fourteen ??? I guess you are a mathematician - these guys are famous for their >lack of ability to count. >Lets see: 2 rows with 8 pieces is 16 > minus 2 black pieces is 14 huh?? > >I'm confused > >regards >Bernhard oops :-))) I just took it for granted without even counting. But I guess it doesn't really matter whether we are talking about 14 or 18 pieces here. Best, Martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.