Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 01:12:49 05/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 2004 at 03:32:25, Slater Wold wrote: >On May 11, 2004 at 02:06:46, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I plan to buy new hardware for WCCC and my question is which hardware is best >>for movei. >> >>If people can run movei in the opening position and tell me nodes per second >>then it may be productive for me in deciding about buying new hardware. >> >>I want to know nodes per second that I can get in the opening position >> >>I am interested in the result that I can get in different hardwares. >> >>I do not plan to implement parallel search but having 2 processors have the >>advantage that I can test with pondering and get results that I can trust so I >>did not decide if to buy a machine with one processor or 2 processors and if the >>difference in speed between one processor and 2 processor is small enough then I >>may decide to go for 2 processors. >> >>Uri > >AMD FX53 (2.4Ghz): > >Movei00_8_178 WB2 17 MB: > 1 00:00 0.35 b1c3 > 2 00:00 0.09 b1c3 b8c6 > 2 00:00 0.10 d2d4 > 2 00:00 0.16 d2d4 b8c6 > 2 00:00 0.17 e2e4 > 2 00:00 0.21 e2e4 b8c6 > 3 00:00 0.40 e2e4 e7e5 f1c4 > 4 00:00 0.06 e2e4 e7e5 d1h5 b8c6 > 5 00:00 0.34 e2e4 d7d5 b1c3 g8f6 e4d5 f6d5 f1b5 c7c6 c3d5 d8d5 > 6 00:00 0.10 e2e4 e7e5 b1c3 f8c5 d1g4 g7g5 > 7 00:00 0.12 e2e4 d7d5 e4e5 b8c6 d2d4 c8f5 b1c3 > 7 00:00 0.13 d2d4 > 7 00:00 0.30 d2d4 e7e6 c1f4 b8c6 g1f3 f8b4 c2c3 b4e7 > 8 00:01 0.09 d2d4 g8f6 b1c3 d7d5 e2e3 c8g4 f1e2 g4f5 > 9 00:01 0.11 d2d4 g8f6 e2e3 e7e6 g1f3 b8c6 f1b5 f8b4 c1d2 b4d6 > 9 00:01 0.12 g1f3 > 9 00:01 0.11 d2d4 g8f6 e2e3 e7e6 g1f3 b8c6 f1b5 f8b4 c1d2 b4d6 >10 00:02 0.10 d2d4 g8f6 b1c3 e7e6 g1f3 f8b4 c1g5 h7h6 g5f4 b8c6 >10 00:03 0.11 b1c3 >10 00:04 0.18 b1c3 b8c6 d2d4 e7e6 g1f3 f8b4 e2e4 d7d5 c1g5 g8e7 >11 00:06 0.15 b1c3 d7d5 d2d4 g8f6 g1f3 e7e6 c1f4 f8b4 e2e3 b4c3 b2c3 b8c6 >11 00:07 0.16 d2d4 >11 00:12 0.19 d2d4 g8f6 g1f3 e7e6 e2e3 b8c6 f1b5 a7a6 b5c6 d7c6 b1c3 >12 00:24 0.11 d2d4 g8f6 g1f3 e7e6 e2e3 d7d5 b1c3 f8b4 f3e5 e8g8 a2a3 b4a5 > >676,440 N/sec > >I would venture to say optimized and profiled with Whidbey, it'd be over 700k. > >Send me the source, and I'll tell you what it runs with Whidbey 32-bit & 64-bit. > ;) BTW - where did you get this thing? Is it much different than the compiler that comes with the 2003 DDK? In the case of Rybka going to 64 bits (2003 DDK compiler) gives an extra 30% or so. Thanks, Vas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.