Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 09:09:42 05/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 2004 at 11:54:13, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On May 11, 2004 at 07:39:44, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>On May 11, 2004 at 07:17:52, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On May 10, 2004 at 13:36:24, Sune Fischer wrote: >>> >>>try to learn some chess instead of trying to comment as a layman onto chess >>>positions. >>> >> >>With eyes shut eh? >> >>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?364557 >> >>-S. > > >Yes. This was tested the wrong way. > >You need to take the weakest program you can find and let it play the black >pieces. Further weaken it by giving it a limited search depth. Take the >strongest program you can find and give it the white pieces. Play the game. If >white wins, it proves black was busted and had played poorly up to that point. > >Vincent said so... > >Isn't it obvious??? > >The bad thing is that that is the most scientific test I have ever seen him do. >:) Note the subtle point, if he criticizes Junior for playing bad it will at the same time weaken his other pet case, namely that of modern top engines should play a lot better positionally than DB did. Quite a pinch. -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.