Author: Harald Faber
Date: 00:13:10 12/17/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 1998 at 11:40:38, blass uri wrote: >>To have a closer idea of the match strength of Chessmaster what about testing >>against the other top programs? With this series we can also see a difference >>between CM6000 and CM6555 and will certainly get proof how strong CM6k >>(probably) is. > >I think it is better to change every time only one parameter in CM6000 because >otherwise maybe some of the changes are productive and some are counter >productive and we do not know what was productive and what was counter >productive So far the CM6555 settings are known, they are known to be good so why test and compare step by step? And another problem is which parameter to change? >I suggest to compare between CM6000 and CM6000 with selective search=10 Everyone is free to do so. It was only a proposal. >I am not going to do games but test them in some practical hard positions that >computer programs need a long time to find the right move(positions from my >correspondence games and positions from games between computers) >Uri Positions where elementary knowledge is requested are really interesting for programs but it doesn't replace real games.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.