Author: Vasik Rajlich
Date: 15:19:11 05/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 2004 at 09:05:42, Slater Wold wrote: >On May 11, 2004 at 04:12:49, Vasik Rajlich wrote: > >>On May 11, 2004 at 03:32:25, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On May 11, 2004 at 02:06:46, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>I plan to buy new hardware for WCCC and my question is which hardware is best >>>>for movei. >>>> >>>>If people can run movei in the opening position and tell me nodes per second >>>>then it may be productive for me in deciding about buying new hardware. >>>> >>>>I want to know nodes per second that I can get in the opening position >>>> >>>>I am interested in the result that I can get in different hardwares. >>>> >>>>I do not plan to implement parallel search but having 2 processors have the >>>>advantage that I can test with pondering and get results that I can trust so I >>>>did not decide if to buy a machine with one processor or 2 processors and if the >>>>difference in speed between one processor and 2 processor is small enough then I >>>>may decide to go for 2 processors. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>AMD FX53 (2.4Ghz): >>> >>>Movei00_8_178 WB2 17 MB: >>> 1 00:00 0.35 b1c3 >>> 2 00:00 0.09 b1c3 b8c6 >>> 2 00:00 0.10 d2d4 >>> 2 00:00 0.16 d2d4 b8c6 >>> 2 00:00 0.17 e2e4 >>> 2 00:00 0.21 e2e4 b8c6 >>> 3 00:00 0.40 e2e4 e7e5 f1c4 >>> 4 00:00 0.06 e2e4 e7e5 d1h5 b8c6 >>> 5 00:00 0.34 e2e4 d7d5 b1c3 g8f6 e4d5 f6d5 f1b5 c7c6 c3d5 d8d5 >>> 6 00:00 0.10 e2e4 e7e5 b1c3 f8c5 d1g4 g7g5 >>> 7 00:00 0.12 e2e4 d7d5 e4e5 b8c6 d2d4 c8f5 b1c3 >>> 7 00:00 0.13 d2d4 >>> 7 00:00 0.30 d2d4 e7e6 c1f4 b8c6 g1f3 f8b4 c2c3 b4e7 >>> 8 00:01 0.09 d2d4 g8f6 b1c3 d7d5 e2e3 c8g4 f1e2 g4f5 >>> 9 00:01 0.11 d2d4 g8f6 e2e3 e7e6 g1f3 b8c6 f1b5 f8b4 c1d2 b4d6 >>> 9 00:01 0.12 g1f3 >>> 9 00:01 0.11 d2d4 g8f6 e2e3 e7e6 g1f3 b8c6 f1b5 f8b4 c1d2 b4d6 >>>10 00:02 0.10 d2d4 g8f6 b1c3 e7e6 g1f3 f8b4 c1g5 h7h6 g5f4 b8c6 >>>10 00:03 0.11 b1c3 >>>10 00:04 0.18 b1c3 b8c6 d2d4 e7e6 g1f3 f8b4 e2e4 d7d5 c1g5 g8e7 >>>11 00:06 0.15 b1c3 d7d5 d2d4 g8f6 g1f3 e7e6 c1f4 f8b4 e2e3 b4c3 b2c3 b8c6 >>>11 00:07 0.16 d2d4 >>>11 00:12 0.19 d2d4 g8f6 g1f3 e7e6 e2e3 b8c6 f1b5 a7a6 b5c6 d7c6 b1c3 >>>12 00:24 0.11 d2d4 g8f6 g1f3 e7e6 e2e3 d7d5 b1c3 f8b4 f3e5 e8g8 a2a3 b4a5 >>> >>>676,440 N/sec >>> >>>I would venture to say optimized and profiled with Whidbey, it'd be over 700k. >>> >>>Send me the source, and I'll tell you what it runs with Whidbey 32-bit & 64-bit. >>> ;) >> >>BTW - where did you get this thing? Is it much different than the compiler that >>comes with the 2003 DDK? > >MS PDC. Very. > >>In the case of Rybka going to 64 bits (2003 DDK compiler) gives an extra 30% or >>so. > >You could probably expect another 15% - 20% from Whidbey, compared to the DDK. > >>Thanks, >>Vas Thanks. Actually it looks like it's also available, as pre-alpha, on MSDN subscriptions. The Visual Studio 2005 Community Technology Preview Weighing in at ... 2.6 GB. Vas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.