Author: margolies,marc
Date: 21:42:35 05/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
Hi, It is unclear to me at least the Mr. Meyer-Kahlen modelled his gui on some one else's. I believe shredder had a histogram before fritz did. the triple brain is unique. the shredder gui looks up end game tables in calculations of variations to decide upon exhanges but the fritz gui looks up endgame tables only when it arrives at a certain endgame position over the board. All those graphic functions you rave about use system resources while the shredder gui is much more performance driven. the ultimate differnce is that shredders gui can act as a fairer arbiter of engine tournaments than the fritz gui which shows some partiality to native engines during multigame tourneys. -MarcM On May 11, 2004 at 16:27:06, Mike Hood wrote: >On May 11, 2004 at 13:18:59, Marc wrote: > >>Recently I stumbled upon shredderchess.de. >>I downloaded the shareware program and i really like it a lot. >>How does it compare to the latest Chessbase interface/functionality, any >>opinions? > >Obviously Stefan Meyer-Kahlen was using the Chessbase GUI as a model to base his >GUI on, so there are a lot of similarities, such as the engine tournaments, the >analysis modes, the histogram and the Coach. However, Stefan has added some >additional features that might persuade you to choose his GUI. The following are >just a few examples, maybe other forum members can point out other features they >find particularly valuable. > >1. The "Endgame Oracle" offers valuable assistance in analysing positions within >the installed endgame tablebases. > >2. The "Triple Brain" makes it possible to link the analysis of two engines into >a combined result. (I personally haven't managed to find positions where this >feature is useful). > >3. The position setup is more flexible than Chessbase's alternative. > >Now for the disadvantages. > >1. Optically, the GUI isn't as finely crafted as Chessbase's GUI. The pieces and >boards in both the 2-D and the 3-D mode are less appealing. > >2. The database functions in the Chessbase GUI are more extensive. Added to >which, the databases used by Fritz are 100% compatible with the format used by >Chessbase 8.0, so there is a direct hook-up. > >3. The Shredder Classic GUI doesn't have the multimedia features of Fritz, such >as chatter during the game. But maybe this is an advantage ;) > >These are just my personal opinions. I'm sure other forum members will add their >thoughts, so you can make your own decision which way you want to go.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.