Author: Ernest Bonnem
Date: 11:26:42 05/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Ingo,
I tried to mail you these questions, but your listed email bounces ;-)
Recently in the CCC forum, you posted results for Shredder 8 as :
..........
21/52 15:24 +1.11++ 1.Nd4 R5b7 2.Nc6 Rc8 3.Nxd6 Qxd6
4.Rc2 Ra8 5.Nxe7 Qxe7 6.d6 Qd7 7.Re2 Ra3
8.Qd5 Rb8 9.Re7 Qd8 10.Qf7 Qg8 (465.791.969) 504
21/52 16:31 +1.11 1.Nd4 R5b7 2.Nc6 Rc8 3.Nxd6 Qxd6
4.Rc2 Nxc6 5.Rxc6 Qb8 6.Rxc8+ Qxc8
7.d6 Qc6 8.Re1 g6 9.Rd1 Kg7 10.Qe6 b3
11.Rd5 (500.073.907) 504
best move: Ne6-d4 time: 26:01.032 min n/s: 498.934 CPU 99.9% n/s(1CPU):
499.433 nodes: 778.844.581
...........
What kind of GUI are you using ? (obviously it's different from the Fritz8 GUI)
2nd question : I installed Shredder 8 native in the Fritz8 GUI, then created a
Shredder 8 (default) UCI by modifying and unmodifying the default parameters of
\UCI\Shredder.exe (the UCI creation fails if you don't simulate a change of
parameters...). I find that the native and UCI engines have exactly the same
performance (with same hash : same solution times, within less than 1%) : UCI
engine running with Fritz8 GUI, ChessPartner GUI. I just have not tried the
ShredderClassic GUI.
Some people have stated that the Shredder 8 UCI engine is faster than the native
: what is your experience ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.