Author: Ingo Bauer
Date: 12:28:19 05/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
Hello >Hi Ingo, >I tried to mail you these questions, but your listed email bounces ;-) > >Recently in the CCC forum, you posted results for Shredder 8 as : >.......... >21/52 15:24 +1.11++ 1.Nd4 R5b7 2.Nc6 Rc8 3.Nxd6 Qxd6 > 4.Rc2 Ra8 5.Nxe7 Qxe7 6.d6 Qd7 7.Re2 Ra3 > 8.Qd5 Rb8 9.Re7 Qd8 10.Qf7 Qg8 (465.791.969) 504 > >21/52 16:31 +1.11 1.Nd4 R5b7 2.Nc6 Rc8 3.Nxd6 Qxd6 > 4.Rc2 Nxc6 5.Rxc6 Qb8 6.Rxc8+ Qxc8 > 7.d6 Qc6 8.Re1 g6 9.Rd1 Kg7 10.Qe6 b3 > 11.Rd5 (500.073.907) 504 > >best move: Ne6-d4 time: 26:01.032 min n/s: 498.934 CPU 99.9% n/s(1CPU): >499.433 nodes: 778.844.581 >........... >What kind of GUI are you using ? (obviously it's different from the Fritz8 GUI) Sure it is different, it is the Shredder Classic GUI! THe feature to get the nice output is called "copy last analysis". Nice, is'nt it? > >2nd question : I installed Shredder 8 native in the Fritz8 GUI, then created a >Shredder 8 (default) UCI by modifying and unmodifying the default parameters of >\UCI\Shredder.exe (the UCI creation fails if you don't simulate a change of >parameters...). I find that the native and UCI engines have exactly the same >performance (with same hash : same solution times, within less than 1%) : UCI >engine running with Fritz8 GUI, ChessPartner GUI. I just have not tried the >ShredderClassic GUI. >Some people have stated that the Shredder 8 UCI engine is faster than the native >: what is your experience ? Good Question. I have not checked this (but I will). It was and is true for the CB-7.04 and the UCI-7.04 in the Classic GUI (estimated ~6% faster in the classic, depending on position) Good advice: Try the Classic, it is really worth the money! Ingo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.