Author: stuart taylor
Date: 06:30:57 05/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 13, 2004 at 15:02:17, Harald Faber wrote: >On May 13, 2004 at 14:01:47, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>On May 13, 2004 at 12:47:25, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>CSTal2.03 - Shredder8, cst2.03-shredder8 2004 >> >>[D]r4rk1/2q1bpp1/p1bppn1p/1p6/4P3/P1N1BP2/1PPQB1PP/1K1R3R w - - 0 1 >> >>CSTal2.03 played now Bxh6!! Very strong tactical move. >> >>Eduard > > >In clearly more than 90% of such CSTal sacs they had come up as incorrect and >later on CSTal lost. This example here is just a lucky punch. If Bxh6 wouldn't >work, CSTal would play it anyway. And in this case it's a perfect winning sacrifice? (I can't easily follow games with my computer as I don't have the setup for it). It gets 2 Pawns for a Bishop, and hurts Black King position, but is there so much after that? (Or did Shredder 8 just defend badly?) S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.