Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Moments of brilliancy.

Author: Dieter Buerssner

Date: 12:14:06 05/14/04

Go up one level in this thread


On May 12, 2004 at 14:57:45, Dan Andersson wrote:

> Yes that's the position. The search is still not finding the last kicker move.
>But it will probably do so when it gets there. Going nine plies deeper it is an
>easy move.
>6kr/1pr1qpp1/p3p1p1/2n1n3/P2N1P2/4P3/1PQRB1PP/3R2K1 b - f3 0 22
>22. .. Ncd3
>6kr/1pr2pp1/p3p1p1/4P3/P2N3q/4P2P/1P1RBnP1/1Q1R2K1 b - - 0 25
>25. .. Nxh3
>6kr/1pr2pp1/p3p1p1/4P3/P2N4/4PK2/1P1RB2q/1Q1R4 b - - 3 29
>29. .. f5 and the tactics begun at move 22 finally makes sense. Considering the
>isolation of the white king black is a bit unlucky not to score a full point.

I tried a game Yace vs. Yace. First try was exactly this line. I tried again out
of curiosity. With rather large thinking time, 40 moves in 1000 minutes. The
game took 2 days, and white won. Instead of 3. h3 (counting from one in the
original position) 3. Nf3 was choosen, with slight positive score. With the long
thinking time, it was seen now, that 3. h3 gives a draw score.

[Event "Computer chess game 40 60000 +0 0 0"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2004.05.13"]
[Round "3"]
[White "Yace 0.99.87"]
[Black "Yace 0.99.87"]
[Result "1-0"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "6kr/1pr1qpp1/p3p1p1/2n1n3/P2N1P2/4P3/1PQRB1PP/3R2K1 b - f3"]

1...Ncd3 {-1.10/14 0.00s} 2. Qb1 {1.01/14 2699.90s} Qh4 {-0.61/14 2461.45s} 3.
Nf3 {0.31/14 1379.49s} (3. h3) 3...Nxf3+ {-0.31/13 1816.94s} 4. Bxf3
{0.46/15 835.86s} Qxh2+ {-0.46/14 1505.93s} 5. Kf1 {0.00s} Nb4
{-0.46/14 1505.93s} 6. Ke2 {0.46/13 1530.07s} Rh4 {-0.67/13 1505.93s}
(6...Nd5) 7. Rd8+ {0.67/13 1530.07s} Kh7 {0.00s} 8. Rc1 {0.88/14 1530.07s}
Rxc1 {-0.82/14 1551.56s} 9. Qxc1 {0.99/15 927.43s} Rg4 {-0.85/14 1551.56s} 10.
Qf1 {0.71/14 1548.90s} Rg3 {-0.83/14 1551.56s} 11. Rd7 {0.89/14 1548.90s} f5
{-0.86/14 1551.56s} 12. Rxb7 {0.87/15 1397.00s} Nd5 {-0.94/15 1023.87s} 13.
Ra7 {0.45/15 3920.97s} g5 {-0.45/14 1570.41s} 14. fxg5 {0.54/14 762.51s} Nb4
{-0.54/13 1570.41s} 15. Re7 {0.46/13 1495.80s} (15. Kd2) 15...Rxg5
{-0.29/14 1313.15s} 16. Rxe6 {0.35/14 1249.54s} Qc7 {-0.35/13 1580.70s} 17.
Kf2 {0.70/13 1505.65s} Qc2+ {-0.78/13 977.46s} 18. Qe2 {0.90/14 908.11s} Qb3
{-0.96/14 1087.34s} 19. Rd6 {0.96/13 1531.63s} Rg6 {-1.01/13 1630.56s} 20. Rd1
{1.01/13 1531.63s} a5 {-1.11/13 1465.42s} 21. e4 {1.07/12 1531.63s} Re6
{-1.04/12 1638.81s} 22. Qb5 {1.04/12 1531.63s} Qxb2+ {-1.14/12 1638.81s} 23.
Kg3 {1.11/12 1531.63s} f4+ {-1.11/12 1638.81s} 24. Kxf4 {1.11/13 1531.67s}
Rf6+ {-1.11/12 1638.81s} 25. Ke3 {1.18/12 1531.63s} Qc3+ {-1.14/12 1638.81s}
26. Ke2 {1.14/13 1531.63s} Nc6 {-1.14/13 1638.81s} 27. Qd3 {1.10/13 1163.00s}
Qe5 {-1.13/12 1638.81s} 28. Qe3 {1.02/12 1557.97s} Qb2+ {-1.18/12 1638.81s}
(28...Kh8) 29. Qd2 {1.18/13 1557.97s} Qe5 {-1.19/13 1638.81s} 30. Rh1+
{1.22/13 1058.10s} Kg8 {-1.22/13 1638.81s} 31. Qd5+ {1.21/13 1253.17s} Qxd5
{-1.27/13 1638.81s} 32. exd5 {1.31/17 899.88s} Ne5 {-1.26/17 1311.00s} 33. Ke3
{1.34/17 1471.95s} Nxf3 {-1.38/16 1679.79s} 34. gxf3 {1.67/20 1098.75s} Rb6
{-1.57/20 865.15s} 35. Ke4 {1.64/20 1360.21s} Kf7 {-1.96/21 4768.97s}
(35...Rb3) 36. Rh8 {1.77/20 1925.60s} Ke7 {-1.78/20 1224.89s} 37. Ra8
{1.80/20 1925.60s} Kf6 {-1.80/20 1225.02s} 38. Rxa5 {1.81/20 1925.60s} Rb4+
{-1.91/20 990.19s} 39. Ke3 {1.91/20 1925.61s} Rb3+ {-1.91/19 1342.19s} 40. Kf4
{1.99/20 1925.62s} (40. Ke2) 40...Rb4+ {-1.99/20 1342.17s} 41. Ke3
{1.99/20 1925.79s} (41. Kg3) 41...Rb3+ {-2.00/20 1500.06s} 42. Kd4
{2.00/20 1500.00s} Rxf3 {-2.39/18 1500.77s} 43. Ra8 {2.39/19 921.47s} Ke7
{-2.00/19 1421.11s} 44. a5 {2.03/19 1340.48s} Kd6 {-2.86/20 4726.93s} 45. a6
{3.27/19 1519.97s} Rf4+ {-9.33/20 4204.67s} 46. Kc3 {9.33/20 1519.95s} Rf7
{-9.73/19 2834.56s} (46...Kc5) 47. Kc4 {10.12/18 1519.94s} Rd7
{-10.12/18 782.72s} 48. Re8 {10.53/17 1519.94s} Ra7 {-12.35/19 3339.35s}
1-0 {Black resigns}

The game was not done under "clean" conditions. I used my computer for other
things, some of which also needed a significant amount of CPU time, now and
then. But at least 50% (probably more) will have been for the game, and most of
the time 100%.

Regards,
Dieter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.