Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 22:32:21 05/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 14, 2004 at 18:40:13, Frank E. Oldham wrote: >here's the speedup test results from dual G5 (2 GHz) >crafty-19.10f > >best speedup = 3.32 >worst speedup = 0.89 > >mt=2a mt=2b mt=2c mt=2d > speedups >==================== >1.88 1.52 1.87 1.54 >2.04 1.91 1.96 1.96 >1.77 1.79 1.77 1.76 >1.96 1.60 1.48 1.78 >2.92 2.92 2.77 2.92 >2.20 1.84 1.92 1.78 >1.87 1.87 1.87 1.87 >1.56 1.62 1.73 1.64 >1.76 1.62 1.79 1.69 >1.83 1.77 1.92 2.04 >2.03 2.32 1.90 2.17 >1.67 1.52 1.92 1.85 >1.12 1.08 1.45 1.99 >3.26 3.39 3.27 2.29 >1.29 1.20 1.30 1.31 >1.33 1.57 1.42 1.45 >1.51 1.55 1.99 2.08 >1.71 1.91 1.36 2.10 >1.54 2.67 2.21 3.32 >2.28 2.28 2.69 2.86 >1.45 2.17 1.55 2.00 >1.40 2.01 0.89 1.56 >1.53 1.69 1.65 1.52 >2.28 1.43 1.43 2.41 >==================== >1.84 1.89 1.84 2.00 mean speed-up >0.50 0.53 0.51 0.49 stdev of mean speed-up > >results seem to match expected values; perhaps slightly higher than the Xeon >tests >because the memory interface is faster > >Frank Please don't post faked data here. We know it is faked because Vincent has said that _everybody_ that tests crafty on duals and quads can't get anywhere my predicted 1.7x and 3.1x speedups...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.