Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 13:51:31 05/16/04
I have been getting messages off and on for several weeks about Vincent's "behind the back" nonsense on ICC. I decided to have Crafty start logging all the channel 64 stuff to see what's up since I am not on much during the day... Here is something I found from over the past few days: DIEP(C DM)(64): hi diep getting debugged now DIEP(C DM)(64): what's up DIEP(C DM)(64): yeah bob is a fraud Celes(C)(64): the 'new' stuff in CCC :) DIEP(C DM)(64): see his article DIEP(C DM)(64): i can proof it DIEP(C DM)(64): DTS article DIEP(C DM)(64): first issue 1997 DIEP(C DM)(64): and the only thing to convince programmers that his cray blitz was having what he claims it has DIEP(C DM)(64): namely the source code DIEP(C DM)(64): it's gone kiwiPete(64): You may be able to prove it, in which case you will have a proof. DIEP(C DM)(64): and he doesn't want to explain to no one how he splitted kiwiPete(64): :-) DIEP(C DM)(64): even though it's 5 lines of source code DIEP(C DM)(64): not to me in 1999 DIEP(C DM)(64): not to anyone in 2004 either DIEP(C DM)(64): anyway DIEP(C DM)(64): it's simple now DIEP(C DM)(64): i asked for his thesis DIEP(C DM)(64): i ordered it and paid for it already DIEP(C DM)(64): if that has the same fraud numbers like 1997 article DIEP(C DM)(64): then big problems DIEP(C DM)(64): if it has correct numbers i leave it at that DIEP(C DM)(64): if his only numbers are the 1997 numbers DIEP(C DM)(64): note that his 1997 publication is the *only* one he did on DTS DIEP(C DM)(64): so he has scientifically proven nothing DIEP(C DM)(64): time will decide now DIEP(C DM)(64): it's easy DIEP(C DM)(64): i sit and wait DIEP(C DM)(64): takes 6 weeks to get delivered Celes(C)(64): true.. hopefully those big hyatt-diepeveen threads will be gone then :) ChessicStudent(64): don't count on it I have a couple of observations. (1) He _finally_ discovered how to deal with University Microfilm, to get a copy of my dissertation. I've been trying to explain that to him for years, but as we all know, he is a bit on the dense side of things. (2) I did my best to explain my "splitting" algorithm to him. But as usual, he knows that this is "5 lines of code" without ever having seen it. And no, I won't be telling him anything _new_ about DTS or anything else. He can find out by himself or do without... I don't cooperate with idiots. (3) He will eventually get the copy of my thesis. If I do not see something written here by him within a reasonable amount of time after that, there _is_ going to be big trouble. Legal trouble. He's accused me of writing things I didn't write, and couldn't find the article. He's accused me of producing fake speedup numbers yet _everybody_ that has run the tests have gotten numbers very similar to mine. I'm not going to cite all the lies he has told, but I will make a promise that if he "runs and hides" this time, I'm going to pay someone to chase him legally. It's about time he learns to grow up and act like a man, rather than a 6-year-old child... As he said above. "Now we wait". But "We won't wait for 4 months this time." I'll be watching and waiting and counting the days...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.