Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 15:21:42 05/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 16, 2004 at 17:59:01, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >A private American citizen suing a Dutch citizen in a Dutch court. Hmmm. I >wonder how many American lawyers specialize in this sort of thing. > >You realize you 2 have an incredibly long history of bickering on the internet, >don't you? I wonder how patient the Dutch courts will be with all that, >especially when you consider it is all within an English speaking forum and not >a Dutch speaking forum. I guess we'll find out... > >What sort of damages will you be suing for? What monetary value would you fix on >it? How often are you prepared to fly over there? Do you speak Dutch by any >chance? Nope to the Dutch. As far as damages, I'll let my attorney make that call. I just intend to _stop_ this nonsense, once and for all... > >I can't figure out how all this makes any sense. I would assume that generally >only corporations and millionaires are willing to undertake such a thing that >has an international dimension. To make this work, I would think you would have >to talk the university into doing this rather than doing it on your own. > >The only sense in it I can see is that your post is intended to scare VD along >with everybody else. Don't want to scare _anyone_ but Vincent. He's had multiple chances to post citations for things I supposedly published, multiple chances to quote exact text where he said I had claimed something I had not. And not once has he _ever_ corrected a wrong statement (AKA lie) that he has written, even though he has been given several chances. > >It will be amusing to see how all this plays out. > >Good luck! I doubt it will be amusing, but I'm pretty sure we will see as I have absolutely no doubt that you will _ever_ see the data in my dissertation mentioned by him. He'll run and hide again... He will probably find other angles to criticize. IE after all the crap about the 1.7 and 3.1 being wrong, and the huge body of evidence from myself and others showing that it is pretty close, he just changed to "the test is no good as it is possible to write a 10% faster serial program and he be using that for the 1cpu time. Of course, 10% is easily wrong. But I adjusted the numbers for that just to see and it didn't make much difference in the overall average... As expected. He's simply dishonest. Nothing more or less. He _never_ provides any data for what _he_ claims. He always demands data when others make statements. But mostly, he lies. often.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.