Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 16:09:58 05/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 16, 2004 at 18:58:49, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On May 16, 2004 at 18:50:21, Anthony Cozzie wrote: > >>On May 16, 2004 at 16:51:31, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>I have been getting messages off and on for several weeks about Vincent's >>>"behind the back" nonsense on ICC. I decided to have Crafty start logging all >>>the channel 64 stuff to see what's up since I am not on much during the day... >>> >>>Here is something I found from over the past few days: >>> >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): hi diep getting debugged now >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): what's up >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): yeah bob is a fraud >>>Celes(C)(64): the 'new' stuff in CCC :) >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): see his article >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): i can proof it >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): DTS article >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): first issue 1997 >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): and the only thing to convince programmers that his cray blitz >>>was having what he claims it has >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): namely the source code >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): it's gone >>>kiwiPete(64): You may be able to prove it, in which case you will have a proof. >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): and he doesn't want to explain to no one how he splitted >>>kiwiPete(64): :-) >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): even though it's 5 lines of source code >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): not to me in 1999 >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): not to anyone in 2004 either >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): anyway >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): it's simple now >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): i asked for his thesis >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): i ordered it and paid for it already >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): if that has the same fraud numbers like 1997 article >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): then big problems >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): if it has correct numbers i leave it at that >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): if his only numbers are the 1997 numbers >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): note that his 1997 publication is the *only* one he did on DTS >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): so he has scientifically proven nothing >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): time will decide now >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): it's easy >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): i sit and wait >>>DIEP(C DM)(64): takes 6 weeks to get delivered >>>Celes(C)(64): true.. hopefully those big hyatt-diepeveen threads will be gone >>>then :) >>>ChessicStudent(64): don't count on it >>> >>> >>>I have a couple of observations. >>> >>>(1) He _finally_ discovered how to deal with University Microfilm, to get a >>>copy of my dissertation. I've been trying to explain that to him for years, but >>>as we all know, he is a bit on the dense side of things. >>> >>>(2) I did my best to explain my "splitting" algorithm to him. But as usual, he >>>knows that this is "5 lines of code" without ever having seen it. And no, I >>>won't be telling him anything _new_ about DTS or anything else. He can find out >>>by himself or do without... I don't cooperate with idiots. >>> >>>(3) He will eventually get the copy of my thesis. If I do not see something >>>written here by him within a reasonable amount of time after that, there _is_ >>>going to be big trouble. Legal trouble. He's accused me of writing things I >>>didn't write, and couldn't find the article. He's accused me of producing fake >>>speedup numbers yet _everybody_ that has run the tests have gotten numbers very >>>similar to mine. I'm not going to cite all the lies he has told, but I will >>>make a promise that if he "runs and hides" this time, I'm going to pay someone >>>to chase him legally. It's about time he learns to grow up and act like a man, >>>rather than a 6-year-old child... >>> >>>As he said above. "Now we wait". But "We won't wait for 4 months this time." >>> >>>I'll be watching and waiting and counting the days... >> >>After all the discussion generated on this forum by your thesis, I think I'm >>going to have to buy a copy. >> >>anthony > > >Wish someone with some good OCR software would buy a copy, scan it, convert it >to text, then I could put it up on my web site. The electronic copy of this was >lost at the same time as the data, all the CB source, all the old crafty >versions, electronic copies of older papers I had written, etc. > >Would be a nice addition, but I can't imagine giving someone a hardcopy I have >in my office and asking them to type it again. :) Why not just scan it and put the scanned images on your website? Not the best option, but better than nothing...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.