Author: Anthony Cozzie
Date: 16:24:49 05/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 16, 2004 at 19:11:55, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On May 16, 2004 at 19:09:58, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > >>On May 16, 2004 at 18:58:49, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On May 16, 2004 at 18:50:21, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >>> >>>>On May 16, 2004 at 16:51:31, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>I have been getting messages off and on for several weeks about Vincent's >>>>>"behind the back" nonsense on ICC. I decided to have Crafty start logging all >>>>>the channel 64 stuff to see what's up since I am not on much during the day... >>>>> >>>>>Here is something I found from over the past few days: >>>>> >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): hi diep getting debugged now >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): what's up >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): yeah bob is a fraud >>>>>Celes(C)(64): the 'new' stuff in CCC :) >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): see his article >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): i can proof it >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): DTS article >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): first issue 1997 >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): and the only thing to convince programmers that his cray blitz >>>>>was having what he claims it has >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): namely the source code >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): it's gone >>>>>kiwiPete(64): You may be able to prove it, in which case you will have a proof. >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): and he doesn't want to explain to no one how he splitted >>>>>kiwiPete(64): :-) >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): even though it's 5 lines of source code >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): not to me in 1999 >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): not to anyone in 2004 either >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): anyway >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): it's simple now >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): i asked for his thesis >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): i ordered it and paid for it already >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): if that has the same fraud numbers like 1997 article >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): then big problems >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): if it has correct numbers i leave it at that >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): if his only numbers are the 1997 numbers >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): note that his 1997 publication is the *only* one he did on DTS >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): so he has scientifically proven nothing >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): time will decide now >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): it's easy >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): i sit and wait >>>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): takes 6 weeks to get delivered >>>>>Celes(C)(64): true.. hopefully those big hyatt-diepeveen threads will be gone >>>>>then :) >>>>>ChessicStudent(64): don't count on it >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>I have a couple of observations. >>>>> >>>>>(1) He _finally_ discovered how to deal with University Microfilm, to get a >>>>>copy of my dissertation. I've been trying to explain that to him for years, but >>>>>as we all know, he is a bit on the dense side of things. >>>>> >>>>>(2) I did my best to explain my "splitting" algorithm to him. But as usual, he >>>>>knows that this is "5 lines of code" without ever having seen it. And no, I >>>>>won't be telling him anything _new_ about DTS or anything else. He can find out >>>>>by himself or do without... I don't cooperate with idiots. >>>>> >>>>>(3) He will eventually get the copy of my thesis. If I do not see something >>>>>written here by him within a reasonable amount of time after that, there _is_ >>>>>going to be big trouble. Legal trouble. He's accused me of writing things I >>>>>didn't write, and couldn't find the article. He's accused me of producing fake >>>>>speedup numbers yet _everybody_ that has run the tests have gotten numbers very >>>>>similar to mine. I'm not going to cite all the lies he has told, but I will >>>>>make a promise that if he "runs and hides" this time, I'm going to pay someone >>>>>to chase him legally. It's about time he learns to grow up and act like a man, >>>>>rather than a 6-year-old child... >>>>> >>>>>As he said above. "Now we wait". But "We won't wait for 4 months this time." >>>>> >>>>>I'll be watching and waiting and counting the days... >>>> >>>>After all the discussion generated on this forum by your thesis, I think I'm >>>>going to have to buy a copy. >>>> >>>>anthony >>> >>> >>>Wish someone with some good OCR software would buy a copy, scan it, convert it >>>to text, then I could put it up on my web site. The electronic copy of this was >>>lost at the same time as the data, all the CB source, all the old crafty >>>versions, electronic copies of older papers I had written, etc. >>> >>>Would be a nice addition, but I can't imagine giving someone a hardcopy I have >>>in my office and asking them to type it again. :) >> >>Why not just scan it and put the scanned images on your website? Not the best >>option, but better than nothing... > >I could probably do that. It's bound so it isn't trivial. But I hate to not >have anything electronic. That's why I put the other stuff on my web site. The >number of requests were simply beyond "out of control". :) This is a perfect task for a worthless undergraduate. Just offer some extra credit :) anthony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.