Author: Dan Andersson
Date: 13:34:59 05/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
It's the same idea as Qd6 and also locking the bishop at e2 thus not completely without merit. But the article seems concerned with countering forced white lines. Unclear seems to carry the meaning 'black suffers but isn't lost' in some positions. And there are lots of reasonable white moves who are not examined. F. ex. white castling in many positions and kingside expansion. Here are a couple such lines off the top of my head. First a wild one: 1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qe5+ 4.Be2 c6 5.Nf3 Qc7 6.d4 Bf5 7.Nh4 Bg6 8.Nxg6 hxg6 9.d5 * white gets d5 in and has the bishop pair and developement for pawns. Then one that isn't completely equalized: 1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qe5+ 4.Be2 c6 5.Nf3 Qc7 6.d4 Bf5 7.d5 Nf6 8.O-O Nxd5 9.Nxd5 cxd5 10.Qxd5 e6 11.Bf4 * IQP grind MvH Dan Andersson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.