Author: José Carlos
Date: 00:32:10 05/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2004 at 13:21:15, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >On May 18, 2004 at 13:07:26, José Carlos wrote: > >>On May 18, 2004 at 12:58:33, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >> >>>On May 18, 2004 at 12:55:25, José Carlos wrote: >>> >>>>On May 18, 2004 at 09:16:34, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 17, 2004 at 05:48:45, Richard Pijl wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>There are thousands of players at Biel, only a dozen at Wijk an Zee. So what ? >>>>>>>When was the last time Kasparov, Polgar, Anand played in Biel ? >>>>>> >>>>>>There are also thousands of (well, at least more than a thousand) players at >>>>>>Wijk aan Zee. >>>>>>Besides the three grandmaster groups there are several other tournaments. >>>>>>See http://www.coruschess.com/ for more info on those (click information-general >>>>>>information). >>>>> >>>>>In Linares there are usually about half a dozen players only. And it is usually >>>>>considered the most important tournament. >>>> >>>> No it isn't. The most important tournament has always been the world champs >>>>where players from all over the world and all levels can participate, in zonals, >>>>interzonals etc. If you are strong enough you can get to play the world champion >>>>if you pass the previous contests. >>> >>>And you must attend in person for the world championship; you don't play over >>>the internet... >> >> Yes, I'm not a program, just a person. But maybe someday someone will invent a >>way to connect directly my brain to a chess server so that I can run automated >>with a fixed protocol. > >That technology is already available, it is called PlayChess, Internet Chess >Club, FICS, etc. But it is not used in serious events, and surely not in world >championships. You miss the point. We can't "automate" a human connected to a chess server the way we can with a program. At ICC, I make the moves on my screen with my mouse. Nothing prevents me from having another computer analyzing the game, a bunch of friends analyzing with me in a physical board, etc. Humans _need_ to play manually. Now you want to waste the marvelous posibility of computers to play automated just to imitate us. As for the rest of my post you don't answer, I guess you implicetely agree that many players is better than a few, which BTW was the main reason of my post. José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.