Author: Reinhard Scharnagl
Date: 05:38:55 05/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 19, 2004 at 07:15:54, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On May 19, 2004 at 01:02:26, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: > >You obviously never wrote a chessprogram writing such utter nonsense at your >homepage about executable size. Vincent, please cool down. Obviously you know neither me nor my experiences with that theme. May be you have not noticed, that I am always talking of the size of the persistent data and exe AFTER COMPRESSING it, e.g. by WinRar. Regards, Reinhard. >>On May 19, 2004 at 00:29:42, Joshua Shriver wrote: >> >>>Are there any kind of hardware limitations in computer competitions? >>> >>>If not, I'd imagine people would just bring a small custom cluster. >>> >>>TSCP would beat Hiarcs or Shredder if tscp was parallelized and Hiarcs was on a >>>486. >>> >>>Just an idea; perhaps there should be some kind of limitation. >>>If not then you're not really testing the strength of the engines, but a >>>combination of code and hardware. In that case, whoever has the most money has a >>>huge advantage. Especially if clustering is allowed. >>> >>>Just my $0.02, curious to your opinions. >> >>Have you ever seen my limitation proposal to that theme at: >> >>[http://homepages.compuserve.de/rescharn/Compu/schachfair_e.html] >> >>Regards, Reinhard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.