Author: Komputer Korner
Date: 01:48:52 12/18/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 1998 at 09:03:04, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Hi KK: >Well, I think is not the way you putted it. You does not become, let us say, a >math reasercher just because between to raise children OR be the mathematician >you chose to be mathematician and the woman prefered to be a mother. You does >not become a high perfomer of anything in that way. I do not imagine girls >choosing since childhood they are going to be mothers instead of another thing. >Probably what happens is that they are carried step by step in a way whose end >is precisely not to be in conditions to do any choice, BUT to become mother. To >be one is most of times more a destiny that an election. And then there is the >disturbing thing about the gifts that each time is discussed produces harsh >replies from progresive thinkers and politically correct people. >By the eay, you count with my vote for the moderation post. I do not know yet if >that show my frienship for you or the contrary...:-) >Fernando i am not running for the post. However on women, there are many women that only want to find a rich guy so they can have babies. Even most of the professional women eventually want babies and they don't have time for chess. A lot of girls that learn chess at a young age grow up thinking about their careers and/ or motherhood and chess becomes very unimportant in the grand scheme of things. Men on the other hand like to play games. Women have more important things to do. -- Komputer Korner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.