Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 19:38:25 05/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 19, 2004 at 22:18:21, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On May 19, 2004 at 22:07:14, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On May 19, 2004 at 20:03:20, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >> >>>Is >>> >>>http://www.hp.com/products1/servers/integrity/superdome_high_end/index.html >>> >>>"Wintel" enough? CPUs (all 64 of them) were made by Intel, and system runs >>>Windows Server 2003. >>> >>>Crafty will need some tuning, but majority of work already done. >> >>Yes i know the superdome. the type of machine you never get access to for >>tournaments. > >Vincent, grow up and stop yammering about things you know _nothing_ about. I >participated at ACM and WCCC events for years, each year showing up with a >machine that would cost from 30 million to 60 million dollars. The superdome is >_nowhere_ near that price level. Show us you can show up with a $30 million machine in 2004+. $50 million machine means around 10000+ processors now. This just for your information. But well with your $2000 budget a year for travel costs of course you join nowhere anymore :) So you find it no problem to waste immense amounts of times to allocate '$30-$60 million dollar machines", where this takes immense time and resources to get them, but spending $2000 on a holiday on participating it just too much. Yes it makes perfect sense to me. You are living in the past, i posted it before. >You just never know what you are talking about... > > > > >> >>Just rewrite the parallel code and it will do fine i guess. >> >>>Thanks, >>>Eugene
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.