Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:02:13 05/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 19, 2004 at 22:21:41, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On May 19, 2004 at 21:33:48, Dan Honeycutt wrote: > >>Whether the rule is new or whether it makes sense was not my point. Omid: you >>have done a good job of keeping your focus on this tournament, not events of the >>past. Because of that Bob has given indication he might enter. But right now >>this rule is the sticking point. Bob: could you say "It's a stupid rule but >>I'll live with it and enter." Or has too much other water already gone under >>the bridge? I hope not. >> >>Dan H. > > >I've already said I am working on hardware. I have a volunteer for book >preparation and operator. There is simply a question of whether there is enough >time to get access to good hardware on such short notice... What do you consider as good hardware. Is the hardware that you used in the last CCT tournament is good or not good enough? If not good enough how much speed improvement you plan to get relative to that hardware. Another question is if 1.5 monthes is not enough time to get access to good hardware. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.