Author: Djordje Vidanovic
Date: 10:43:15 05/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 20, 2004 at 12:52:40, george wrote: >1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 exd4 4. Nxd4 Bc5 5. Be3 Qf6 6. c3 b6 7. g3 Bb7 8. Bg2 >O-O-O 9. O-O h5 10. b4 Bxd4 11. cxd4 h4 12. Nc3 Kb8 13. Rc1 Rc8 14. Nd5 Qg6 15. >b5 Na5 16. Nxc7 Rxc7 17. Bf4 d6 18. Rxc7 Kxc7 19. Qc1+ Kb8 20. e5 d5 21. e6+ Ka8 >22. Qc7 Nf6 23. e7 Rc8 24. Qd8 Qf5 25. Re1 h3 26. Re5 Qb1+ 27. Bf1 a6 28. e8=Q >Nxe8 29. Rxe8 Rxd8 30. Rxd8+ Ka7 31. Bb8+ 1/2-1/2 > > > >well is move 16.Nc7 wrong??? how doi computer eveluate this move??? > >well i loved this game...small little guy showed almost no respect on his >oponent..and a 2700 elo player !!!!!! Nice game. I think that Borki Predojevic was winning somewhere along the way, perhaps 28.Qf8! was winning... Not sure though, may be he could have won even before that. Anyway, to try to answer your question about computers and the sac on c7: I don't think that computers would approve of 16.Nc7 because it is too deep and there are lots of branchings (haven't checked it though). Besides, computer programs are, ultimately, materialistic. This kind of "intuitive" Tal-esque tactics is something that chess software has not attained fully (yet). First harbingers did appear though: Chess Tiger about two years ago, then Shredder 7.04, Shredder 8, and, above all, "the speculative beancounters" such as Deep Junior (may be the strongest of the batch), and the new versions of Ruffian and Deep Sjeng. Hiarcs and the King, although fantastic attackers, are not so speculative nor are they typical beancounters...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.