Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 11:19:20 05/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 20, 2004 at 11:31:35, Dan Honeycutt wrote: >On May 19, 2004 at 22:21:41, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On May 19, 2004 at 21:33:48, Dan Honeycutt wrote: >> >>>Whether the rule is new or whether it makes sense was not my point. Omid: you >>>have done a good job of keeping your focus on this tournament, not events of the >>>past. Because of that Bob has given indication he might enter. But right now >>>this rule is the sticking point. Bob: could you say "It's a stupid rule but >>>I'll live with it and enter." Or has too much other water already gone under >>>the bridge? I hope not. >>> >>>Dan H. >> >> >>I've already said I am working on hardware. I have a volunteer for book >>preparation and operator. There is simply a question of whether there is enough >>time to get access to good hardware on such short notice... > >You did say that. But then you later said you were putting the search on hold >till this entry fee business was resolved. Thats when I piped up. At any rate, >thats fantastic. Hopefully the hardware search will work out. > >Dan H. I probably was sloppy in my wording. The "double entry fee" issue raises warning hackles that "no non-programmer operator" could become a possibility. Omid seems to think "no" so I'm going with that and proceeding. Whether it will work or not is unknown, but I'll certainly try...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.