Author: Evgeny Shu
Date: 12:01:07 05/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 20, 2004 at 14:50:08, Steve Maughan wrote: >Evgeny, wrote: > >>What really puzzles me .. on that page hiarcs.com is that method for testing >>the Chess Strength . > >[snip] > >>Looks like a joke :) > >What's your problem? Hiarcs for the Palm is in development and they have >published some [impressive] blitz results against dedicated hardware. Looking >at the margin of victory I would say that there is a reasonable level of >statistical significance - maybe 80% chance that Hiarcs for the Palm is better >at blitz than all of the dedicated machines tested. Why is this a joke? > >>I would only buy from chessbase and not from this strange page with all >>respect > >I cannot remeber one ChessBase product that has published a statistically >significant sample of games as part of it's promotional blurb. Hmm, I was simply saying - hiarcs is now chessbase product, so I would prefer to buy palm hiarcs from chessbase too , and not from some _unknown_ site. if you like lokasoft buy from lokasoft . I am not here to advertise. But _statistical significance_ :) ask Chesstiger author he will tell you about statistical significance .. I didn't say chessbase publish statistics - but I trust SSDF , don't you ? > >I smell a troll! > >Regards, > >Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.