Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:37:07 05/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 20, 2004 at 15:28:36, Sune Fischer wrote: >On May 20, 2004 at 15:14:04, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On May 20, 2004 at 15:01:19, Sune Fischer wrote: >> >>>On May 20, 2004 at 14:30:37, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On May 20, 2004 at 14:20:40, Sune Fischer wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 20, 2004 at 13:30:00, John Merlino wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>CM_SKR on an AMD 2500+ also prefers g5, and doesn't think for very long about >>>>>>any of the other moves. But then there's a big fail low at depth 14 and it can >>>>>>see how the game is going to go all the way up through 28...Be6. The King then >>>>>>analyzes 23...Be6 for more than three minutes, but does not see an improvement. >>>>>>A further two minutes on b5 finally produces a new move, but it doesn't look >>>>>>good for Black: >>>>> >>>>>CM needs 6 minutes for a positive score for white, >>>>>and has +0.32 for white after 11 minutes? >>>>> >>>>>I'm not saying I like black's position, but judging by the score it certainly >>>>>looks pretty even. >>>>> >>>>>-S. >>>> >>>>judging by the score it seems that white has a small advantage. >>> >>>Pretty even doesn't mean 0.00, it means 0.00 +- 0.5 >> >>No it means 0.00+-0.25 >> >>0.32 is not pretty even. > >I disagree. >Pretty even means drawish and 0.32 is definitely _not_ a convincing winning >score by any definition. there is something in the middle between convincing winnoing score and drawish. I do not consider 0.32 as convincing winning score but I also do not consider it as drawish. Uri Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.